Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32443618›Full record

ReviewPolymers2020

Functional Polymers Structures for (Bio)Sensing Application-A Review.

Kamila Spychalska, Dorota Zając, Sylwia Baluta, Kinga Halicka, Joanna Cabaj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent developments in waterborne pathogen detection technologies.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The application of nanomedicine in clinical settings.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kamila SpychalskaFaculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-137 Wrocław, Poland.
Dorota ZającFaculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-137 Wrocław, Poland.
Sylwia BalutaFaculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-137 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2090-1650
Kinga HalickaFaculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-137 Wrocław, Poland.
Joanna CabajFaculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-137 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7292-9327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review we present polymeric materials for (bio)sensor technology development. We focused on conductive polymers (conjugated microporous polymer, polymer gels), composites, molecularly imprinted polymers and their influence on the design and fabrication of bio(sensors), which in the future could act as lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices. LOC instruments enable us to perform a wide range of analysis away from the stationary laboratory. Characterized polymeric species represent promising candidates in biosensor or sensor technology for LOC development, not only for manufacturing these devices, but also as a surface for biologically active materials' immobilization. The presence of biological compounds can improve the sensitivity and selectivity of analytical tools, which in the case of medical diagnostics is extremely important. The described materials are biocompatible, cost-effective, flexible and are an excellent platform for the anchoring of specific compounds.

Indexed as

compositesconducting polymerselectrochemical sensinglab-on-a-chipmicrofluidicsmolecularly imprinted polymers

Identifiers

PMID32443618
PMCPMC7285029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.