Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32443358›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Loss to follow-up and opportunities for reengagement in HIV care in rural Mozambique: A prospective cohort study.

Laura Fuente-Soro, Elisa López-Varela, Orvalho Augusto, Edson Luis Bernardo, Charfudin Sacoor, Ariel Nhacolo, Paula Ruiz-Castillo, Charity Alfredo, Esmeralda Karajeanes, Paula Vaz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura Fuente-SoroCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Elisa López-VarelaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Orvalho AugustoCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Edson Luis BernardoCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Charfudin SacoorCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Ariel NhacoloCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.
Paula Ruiz-CastilloISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Hospital Clínic -00 Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Charity AlfredoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Esmeralda KarajeanesFundação Ariel Glaser Contra o SIDA Pediátrico, Maputo, Mozambique.
Paula VazFundação Ariel Glaser Contra o SIDA Pediátrico, Maputo, Mozambique.
Denise NanicheCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) over the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cascade have poor clinical outcomes and contribute to onward HIV transmission. We assessed true care outcomes and factors associated with successful reengagement in patients LTFU in southern Mozambique.Newly diagnosed HIV-positive adults were consecutively recruited in the Manhiça District. Patients LTFU within 12 months after HIV diagnosis were visited at home from June 2015 to July 2016 and interviewed for ascertainment of outcomes and reasons for LTFU. Factors associated with reengagement in care within 90 days after the home visit were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model.Among 1122 newly HIV-diagnosed adults, 691 (61.6%) were identified as LTFU. Of those, 557 (80.6%) were approached at their homes and 321 (57.6%) found at home. Over 50% had died or migrated, 10% had been misclassified as LTFU, and 252 (78.5%) were interviewed. Following the visit, 79 (31.3%) reengaged in care. Having registered in care and a shorter time between LTFU and visit were associated with reengagement in multivariate analyses: adjusted hazards ratio of 3.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.81-6.92; P < .001] and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-1.00; P = .045), respectively. The most frequently reported barriers were the lack of trust in the HIV-diagnosis, the perception of being in good health, and fear of being badly treated by health personnel and differed by type of LTFU.Estimates of LTFU in rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa are likely to be overestimated in the absence of active tracing strategies. Home visits are resource-intensive but useful strategies for reengagement for at least one-third of LTFU patients when applied in the context of differentiated care for those LTFU individuals who had already enrolled in HIV care at some point.

Indexed as

Lost to Follow-UpAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMozambiqueProspective StudiesRural PopulationTreatment Adherence and ComplianceAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID32443358
PMCPMC7254184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.