ArticleMedicine2020
Prospective randomized controlled trial study of Luofengning granule in the treatment of unstable angina.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural Herbal Medicine as a Treatment Strategy for Myocardial Infarction through the Regulation of Angiogenesis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- Metoprolol combined with nicorandil on unstable angina pectoris can reduce incidence of cardiovascular events and inflammatory reactions.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough the current western treatment plans for unstable angina (UA) has been optimized in past decades, UA still is a common phenotype of acute coronary syndrome and significantly influence the quality of life and endanger lives. In China, the clinical application of Chinese herb medicine is considered as an effective approach to treating UA and widely recognized by patients. In clinical practices, we found Luofengning granule (LFN-G) could improve clinical manifestations of patients with UA, but there is lack of rigorous proof of evidence-based medicine. This trial aims to further evaluate the efficacy of LFN-G in the treatment of UA.
methodsA prospective, open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical will be performed. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with UA will be randomly allocated to either the treatment group or the control group with a 1:1 ratio. The participants in the treatment group will receive LFN-G treatment and the participants in the control group will receive placebo. Meanwhile, both groups continue to undergo standard western medicine treatments. The duration of interventions is 4 weeks. The primary endpoint is the incidence of major cardiac adverse events, defined as a composite of recurrent angina, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), severe arrhythmia, heart failure, and cardiac death. Secondary outcomes include Seattle angina scale score, Chinese medicine syndromes and electrocardiograph (at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4), myocardial nuclides perfusion, measurement of wall motion score index and left ventricular ejection fraction, serum inflammation factors such as C-reactive protein, high sensitive-C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and so on (at weeks 0, 4). In addition, some biochemical indexes of blood and hematological indexes will be used to assess the safety of treatments. Any adverse effects of the treatment will be recorded. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide compelling evidence of the efficacy and safety of LFN-G for treatment of UA and preliminarily reveal the potential mechanism of how LFN-G acts. Finally, it will widen treatment options for patients with UA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.