Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32443145›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2022

Modeling continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data during sleep.

Irina Gaynanova, Naresh Punjabi, Ciprian Crainiceanu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Fast Multilevel Functional Principal Component Analysis.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irina GaynanovaDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, MS 3143, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Naresh PunjabiSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ciprian CrainiceanuDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Statistical Methods for Multilevel Multivariate Functional StudiesR01NS060910 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ciprian M Crainiceanu · 2009 to 2026
$8.3M
Sleep Fragmentation and Altered Glucose MetabolismF32HL083640 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STAMATAKIS, KATHERINE A · 2006 to 2007
$56k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL083640NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a multilevel functional Beta model to quantify the blood glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitors for multiple days in study participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The model estimates the subject-specific marginal quantiles, quantifies the within- and between-subject variability, and produces interpretable parameters of blood glucose dynamics as a function of time from the actigraphy-estimated sleep onset. Results are validated via simulations and by studying the association between the estimated model parameters and hemoglobin A1c, the gold standard for assessing glucose control in diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringGlycated HemoglobinHumansSleepBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinActigraphyBeta distributionFunctional PCAHemoglobin A1c

Identifiers

PMID32443145
PMCPMC8942115
OpenAlexW3026613878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.