Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32442987›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2020

Decoding hand kinematics from population responses in sensorimotor cortex during grasping.

Elizaveta V Okorokova, James M Goodman, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos, Sliman J Bensmaia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Primate neuroethology: a new synthesis.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Limb state accounts for differences between motor imagery and action in motor cortex.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prehension kinematics in humans and macaques.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizaveta V OkorokovaCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2719-2706
James M GoodmanCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6055-0600
Nicholas G HatsopoulosCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4913-6051
Sliman J BensmaiaCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4039-9135
University of Chicago · USNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RU

Funding

Sensory mechanisms of manual dexterity and their application to neuroprostheticsR35NS122333 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HATSOPOULOS, NICHOLAS G · 2021 to 2024
$4.5M
Coding of Action by Motor & Premotor Cortical EnsemblesR01NS045853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HATSOPOULOS, NICHOLAS G · 2004 to 2017
$4.5M
Biomimetic Somatosensory Feedback through IntracorticalmicrostimulationR01NS095251 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BENSMAIA, SLIMAN, GRILL, WARREN M. · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
Hand proprioception and sensorimotor interplayR01NS082865 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BENSMAIA, SLIMAN · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045853NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082865NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS122333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe hand-a complex effector comprising dozens of degrees of freedom of movement-endows us with the ability to flexibly, precisely, and effortlessly interact with objects. The neural signals associated with dexterous hand movements in primary motor cortex (M1) and somatosensory cortex (SC) have received comparatively less attention than have those associated with proximal upper limb control. APPROACH: To fill this gap, we trained two monkeys to grasp objects varying in size and shape while tracking their hand postures and recording single-unit activity from M1 and SC. We then decoded their hand kinematics across tens of joints from population activity in these areas. MAIN

resultsWe found that we could accurately decode kinematics with a small number of neural signals and that different cortical fields carry different amounts of information about hand kinematics. In particular, neural signals in rostral M1 led to better performance than did signals in caudal M1, whereas Brodmann's area 3a outperformed areas 1 and 2 in SC. Moreover, decoding performance was higher for joint angles than joint angular velocities, in contrast to what has been found with proximal limb decoders. SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that cortical signals can be used for dexterous hand control in brain machine interface applications and that postural representations in SC may be exploited via intracortical stimulation to close the sensorimotor loop.

Indexed as

Motor CortexSensorimotor CortexBiomechanical PhenomenaHandHand StrengthMovement

Identifiers

PMID32442987
PMCPMC13580650
OpenAlexW3026651163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.