ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2020
Stem Cell Mobilization and Autograft Minimal Residual Disease Negativity with Novel Induction Regimens in Multiple Myeloma.
Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase II study of novel CXCR2 agonist and Plerixafor for rapid stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2024Trial
- Measurable residual disease assessment in apheresis product from multiple myeloma patients: Correlation with biology, depth of response and survival.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Article
- The impact of multiple myeloma drugs treatments on autologous stem cell transplantation in the era of new drugs.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Predictive factors for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies: A single-center experience.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023Review
- Impact of clonal plasma cells in autografts on outcomes in high-risk multiple myeloma patients.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: challenges, strategies, and current developments.Annals of hematology · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Is Quantification of Measurable Clonal Plasma Cells in Stem Cell Grafts (gMRD) Clinically Meaningful?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Autologous stem-cell collection following VTD or VRD induction therapy in multiple myeloma: a single-center experience.Bone marrow transplantation · 2021Article
- Summary of the Highlights of 2019 ASTCT Meeting by iNDUS BMT Group at Chennai, India.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) is the most common triplet regimen for newly diagnosed MM in the United States. Carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRD) has shown promising efficacy and may supplant VRD. We compared stem cell yields and autograft minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity after VRD and KRD induction. Deeper responses (ie, very good partial response or better) were more common with KRD. Precollection bone marrow (BM) cellularity, interval from the end of induction therapy to start of stem cell collection, and method of stem cell mobilization were similar for the 2 cohorts. Days to complete collection was greater with KRD (2.2 days, versus 1.81 days with VRD), which more often required ≥3 days of apheresis. Precollection viable CD34
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.