ReviewInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2020
Diagnostic dilemma of perioperative myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting: A review.
Review in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benign emergence of pathological Q waves following minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a case series.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- How Much Is Too Much? Cardiac Biomarkers After Cardiac Surgery: A Debate With No End in Sight?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- The assessment of thiol-disulfide homeostasis and ıschemia-modified albumin levels in patients with acromegaly.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Symptomatic early coronary graft failure in bypass surgery patients: incidence, predictors and clinical impact.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025Article
- Perioperative infarction during coronary bypass surgery: an attempt to refine the diagnostic criteria using data from a retrospective case-control study.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Article
- Great debate: myocardial infarction after cardiac surgery must be redefined.European heart journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Effects of peak time of myocardial injury biomarkers on mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing OPCABG.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most commonly performed cardiac procedures in the United States (US) and Europe. In the US, perioperative morbidity and mortality related to CABG are below 5%. One of the most significant complications following CABG, however, is perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI). Cardiac biomarkers, intra- and post-operative echocardiography, and electrocardiography are routinely used to monitor for evidence of PMI. In this review, we seek to summarize how each of these modalities is used in the clinical setting to differentiate PMI from expected procedure-related changes, and how these findings impact patients' outcomes. We conclude that while no perfect diagnostic test for the detection of clinically meaningful PMI exists, using a combination of existing modalities with knowledge of expected post-procedure changes allows for early and reliable detection. Future development is needed to create more sensitive and specific modalities for the detection of PMI in patients undergoing CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.