ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2020
Differences in Intraretinal Pigment Migration Across Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outer retinal tubulation associated with photoreceptor degeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- Article
- Cross-Sectional Analysis of Outer Retinal Tubulation in Inherited Retinal Diseases: A Multicenter Study.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- RBP3-Retinopathy-Inherited High Myopia and Retinal Dystrophy: Genetic Characterization, Natural History, and Deep Phenotyping.American journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Retinal Manifestations of Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Disorders.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether there are differences in the prevalence of intraretinal pigment migration (IPM) across ages and genetic causes of inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs).
designRetrospective cohort study.
methodsPatients were evaluated at a single tertiary referral center. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of IRD and confirmatory genetic testing were included in these analyses. A total of 392 patients fit inclusion criteria, and 151 patients were excluded based on inconclusive genetic testing. Patients were placed into 3 groups, ciliary and ciliary-related photoreceptor, nonciliary photoreceptor, and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), based on the cellular expression of the gene and the primary affected cell type. The presence of IPM was evaluated by using slit lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and wide-field color fundus photography.
resultsIPM was seen in 257 of 339 patients (75.8%) with mutations in photoreceptor-specific genes and in 18 of 53 patients (34.0%) with mutations in RPE-specific genes (P < .0001). Pairwise analysis following stratification by age and gene category suggested significant differences at all age groups between patients with mutations in photoreceptor-specific genes and patients with mutations in RPE-specific genes (P < .05). A fitted multivariate logistic regression model was produced and demonstrated that the incidence of IPM increases as a function of both age and gene category.
conclusionsIPM is a finding more commonly observed in IRDs caused by mutations in photoreceptor-specific genes than RPE-specific genes. The absence of IPM does not always rule out IRD and should raise suspicion for disease mutations in RPE-specific genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.