Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32442292›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2020

Evaluation of Domains of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Recovery After Childbirth: A Scoping and Systematic Review.

Pervez Sultan, Nishant Sadana, Nadir Sharawi, Lindsay Blake, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Andrea Falvo, Sarah Ciechanowicz, Waseem Athar, Raj Shah, Nan Guo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Proposed domains of postpartum sleep: a concept elicitation study using qualitative interviews.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Care Bundles: Enhanced Recovery After Delivery.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Proposed domains for assessing postpartum recovery: a concept elicitation study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Pervez SultanStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Nishant SadanaDepartment of Anesthesia, Mercyhealth, Rockford, Illinois.
Nadir SharawiDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Lindsay BlakeDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Kariem El-BoghdadlyAnaesthetic Service, Guy's and St Thomas National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Andrea FalvoAnaesthetics Department, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah CiechanowiczAnaesthetics Department, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Waseem AtharStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Raj ShahDepartment of Anaesthesia, Watford General Hospital, Watford, United Kingdom.
Nan GuoStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Sally JensenDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Yasser El-SayedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
David CellaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Brendan CarvalhoStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USMercy Health · USNational Health Service · GBWatford General Hospital · GB

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Despite the global delivery rate being approximately 259 deliveries per minute in 2018, postpartum recovery remains poorly defined. Objectives: To identify validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess outpatient and inpatient postpartum recovery, evaluate frequency of PROM use, report the proportion of identified PROMs used within each recovery domain, report the number of published studies within each recovery domain, summarize descriptive data (country of origin, year of study, and journal specialty) for published studies using PROMs to evaluate postpartum recovery, and report PROMs used to evaluate global postpartum recovery. Evidence Review: This study followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A literature search of 4 databases (MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL) was performed on July 1, 2019, to identify PROMs used to evaluate 12 author-defined domains of postpartum recovery. All psychometrically evaluated PROMs used to evaluate inpatient or outpatient postpartum recovery after all delivery modes were included. Findings: From 8008 screened titles and abstracts, 573 studies (515 outpatient and 58 inpatient) were identified in this review. A total of 201 PROMs were used to assess recovery for outpatient studies and 73 PROMs were used to assess recovery for inpatient studies. The top 5 domains (with highest to lowest numbers of PROMs) used to assess outpatient recovery were psychosocial distress (77 PROMs), surgical complications (26 PROMs), psychosocial support (27 PROMs), motherhood experience (16 PROMs), and sexual function (13 PROMs). Among inpatient studies, the top 5 domains were psychosocial distress (32 PROMs), motherhood experience (7 PROMs), psychosocial support (5 PROMs), fatigue (5 PROMs), and cognition (3 PROMs). The 3 most frequently used PROMs were the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (267 studies), Short-Form 36 Health Questionnaire (global recovery assessment; 40 studies), and Female Sexual Function Index (35 studies). A total of 24 global recovery PROMs were identified among all included studies. Most studies were undertaken in the United States within the last decade and were published in psychiatry and obstetrics and gynecology journals. Conclusions and Relevance: Most PROMs identified in this review evaluated a single domain of recovery. Future research should focus on determining the psychometric properties of individual and global recovery PROMs identified in this review to provide recommendations regarding optimum measures of postpartum recovery.

Indexed as

ParturitionPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresBibliometricsDelivery, ObstetricHumansPostnatal Care

Identifiers

PMID32442292
PMCPMC7244991
OpenAlexW3027703744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.