Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32442213›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Overcoming collinearity in path analysis of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grain oil content.

Murilo Viotto Del Conte, Pedro Crescêncio Souza Carneiro, Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende, Felipe Lopes da Silva, Luiz Alexandre Peternelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Murilo Viotto Del ConteDepartamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9142-8592
Pedro Crescêncio Souza CarneiroDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Marcos Deon Vilela de ResendeEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Florestas, Colombo, Paraná, Brasil.
Felipe Lopes da SilvaDepartamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Luiz Alexandre PeternelliDepartamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Path analysis allows understanding the direct and indirect effects among traits. Multicollinearity in correlation matrices may cause a bias in path analysis estimates. This study aimed to: a) understand the correlation among soybean traits and estimate their direct and indirect effects on gain oil content; b) verify the efficiency of ridge path analysis and trait culling to overcome colinearity. Three different matrices with different levels of collinearity were obtained by trait culling. Ridge path analysis was performed on matrices with strong collinearity; otherwise, a traditional path analysis was performed. The same analyses were run on a simulated dataset. Trait culling was applied to matrix R originating the matrices R1 and R2. Path analysis for matrices R1 and R2 presented a high determination coefficient (0.856 and 0.832, respectively) and low effect of the residual variable (0.379 and 0.410 respectively). Ridge path analysis presented low determination coefficient (0.657) and no direct effects greater than the effects of the residual variable (0.585). Trait culling was more effective to overcome collinearity. Mass of grains, number of nodes, and number of pods are promising for indirect selection for oil content.

Indexed as

Soybean OilEdible GrainGlycine maxPhenotypePlant BreedingQuantitative Trait LociSoybean Oil

Identifiers

PMID32442213
PMCPMC7244132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.