ArticlePloS one2020
Generation of imidazolinone herbicide resistant trait in Arabidopsis.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precise genome editing process and its applications in plants driven by AI.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Understanding the structural basis of ALS mutations associated with resistance to sulfonylurea in wheat.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evolution of agricultural biotechnology is the paradigm shift in crop resilience and development: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas system-mediated base editing in crops: recent developments and future prospects.Plant cell reports · 2024Review
- Crop bioengineering via gene editing: reshaping the future of agriculture.Plant cell reports · 2024Review
- Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Response Mechanism ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Enhancing the quality of staple food crops through CRISPR/Cas-mediated site-directed mutagenesis.Planta · 2023Review
- Modified Gene Editing Systems: Diverse Bioengineering Tools and Crop Improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors.Nature plants · 2021Review
- Sequence modification on demand: search and replace tools for precise gene editing in plants.Transgenic research · 2021Review
- Base Editing in Plants: Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently-emerged base editing technologies could create single base mutations at precise genomic positions without generation DNA double strand breaks. Herbicide resistant mutations have been successfully introduced to different plant species, including Arabidopsis, watermelon, wheat, potato and tomato via C to T (or G to A on the complementary strand) base editors (CBE) at the P197 position of endogenous acetolactate synthase (ALS) genes. Additionally, G to A conversion to another conserved amino acid S653 on ALS gene could confer tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides. However, no such mutation was successfully generated via CBE, likely due to the target C base is outside of the classic base editing window. Since CBE driven by egg cell (EC) specific promoter would re-edit the wild type alleles in egg cells and early embryos, we hypothesized the diversity of base editing outcomes could be largely increased at later generations to allow selection of desired herbicide resistant mutants. To test this hypothesis, we aimed to introduce C to T conversion to the complement strand of S653 codon at ALS gene, hosting a C at the 10th position within the 20-nt spacer sequence outside of the classic base editing window. While we did not detect base-edited T1 plants, efficient and diverse base edits emerged at later generations. Herbicide resistant mutants with different editing outcomes were recovered when T3 and T4 seeds were subject to herbicide selection. As expected, most herbicide resistant plants contained S653N mutation as a result of G10 to A10. Our results showed that CBE could create imidazolinone herbicide resistant trait in Arabidopsis and be potentially applied to crops to facilitate weed control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.