Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32442169›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Utility of TEMPS-A in differentiation between major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, and bipolar II disorder.

Chihiro Morishita, Rie Kameyama, Hiroyuki Toda, Jiro Masuya, Masahiko Ichiki, Ichiro Kusumi, Takeshi Inoue

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Relationships of affective temperament ratings to diagnosis and morbidity measures in major affective disorders.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Affective Temperament and Glycemic Control - The Psychological Aspect of Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chihiro MorishitaDepartment of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8480-9303
Rie KameyamaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Takikawa Municipal Hospital, Takikawa-shi, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hiroyuki TodaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa-shi, Saitama, Japan.
Jiro MasuyaDepartment of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiko IchikiDepartment of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro KusumiDepartment of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takeshi InoueDepartment of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University · JPHokkaido University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between temperament characteristics and mood disorders has gained much attention in recent years. The Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-autoquestionnaire version (TEMPS-A) is a self-rating scale measuring 5 affective temperament dimensions. In this study, we aimed to clarify whether each affective temperament of TEMPS-A is a differentiating factor between major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar I disorder (BD-I), and bipolar II disorder (BD-II), and analyzed the utility of TEMPS-A in their differential diagnosis in a clinical setting.

methodsA total of 346 patients (MDD, n = 176; BD-II, n = 112; BD-I, n = 58) filled out TEMPS-A. To assess the patients' mood state at the time of temperament assessment, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were also conducted.

resultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that cyclothymic and anxious temperament scores were significant factors differentiating the diagnosis of BD-I and BD-II from the diagnosis of MDD, and hyperthymic temperament score was a specific factor for the differential diagnosis of BD-I versus the diagnosis of BD-II. LIMITATIONS: All of the patients included in our study received treatment in large general hospitals. Because the nature of the present study was cross-sectional, some MDD subjects in this study might have unrecognized BD-I/BD-II.

conclusionsCyclothymic and anxious temperament scores assessed by TEMPS-A might enable differentiation between MDD and BD, and hyperthymic temperament score on TEMPS-A might be useful in distinguishing between BD-I and BD-II.

Indexed as

Personality InventoryTemperamentAdultAffectAnxietyBipolar DisorderCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID32442169
PMCPMC7244116
OpenAlexW3026797211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.