Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32442160›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2020

Engaging Children and Young People in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review of Modes of Delivery, Facilitators, and Barriers.

Shaun Liverpool, Catarina Pinheiro Mota, Célia M D Sales, Anja Čuš, Sara Carletto, Camellia Hancheva, Sónia Sousa, Sonia Conejo Cerón, Patricia Moreno-Peral, Giada Pietrabissa and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 223 papers, 28 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
223citing papers in PubMed, 28 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

223 citing papers in PubMed, 28 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

163 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shaun LiverpoolEvidence-Based Practice Unit, University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6419-8552
Catarina Pinheiro MotaCenter for Psychology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-7425
Célia M D SalesFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-8469
Anja ČušDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5803-7151
Sara CarlettoDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-7479
Camellia HanchevaFaculty of Philosophy, General, Experimental, Developmental, and Health Psychology, Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-0121-1750
Sónia SousaSchool of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-5865-1389
Sonia Conejo CerónBiomedical Research Institute of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1357-2281
Patricia Moreno-PeralBiomedical Research Institute of Malaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4130-9090
Giada PietrabissaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5911-5748
Bettina MoltrechtEvidence-Based Practice Unit, University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1838-428X
Randi UlbergDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8872-8706
Nuno FerreiraUniversity of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-5787-904X
Julian Edbrooke-ChildsEvidence-Based Practice Unit, University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0401-4058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a high prevalence of children and young people (CYP) experiencing mental health (MH) problems. Owing to accessibility, affordability, and scalability, an increasing number of digital health interventions (DHIs) have been developed and incorporated into MH treatment. Studies have shown the potential of DHIs to improve MH outcomes. However, the modes of delivery used to engage CYP in digital MH interventions may differ, with implications for the extent to which findings pertain to the level of engagement with the DHI. Knowledge of the various modalities could aid in the development of interventions that are acceptable and feasible.

objectiveThis review aimed to (1) identify modes of delivery used in CYP digital MH interventions, (2) explore influencing factors to usage and implementation, and (3) investigate ways in which the interventions have been evaluated and whether CYP engage in DHIs.

methodsA literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), and PsycINFO databases using 3 key concepts "child and adolescent mental health," "digital intervention," and "engagement." Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed using rigorous inclusion criteria and screening by at least two reviewers. The selected articles were assessed for quality using the mixed methods appraisal tool, and data were extracted to address the review aims. Data aggregation and synthesis were conducted and presented as descriptive numerical summaries and a narrative synthesis, respectively.

resultsThis study identified 6 modes of delivery from 83 articles and 71 interventions for engaging CYP: (1) websites, (2) games and computer-assisted programs, (3) apps, (4) robots and digital devices, (5) virtual reality, and (6) mobile text messaging. Overall, 2 themes emerged highlighting intervention-specific and person-specific barriers and facilitators to CYP's engagement. These themes encompassed factors such as suitability, usability, and acceptability of the DHIs and motivation, capability, and opportunity for the CYP using DHIs. The literature highlighted that CYP prefer DHIs with features such as videos, limited text, ability to personalize, ability to connect with others, and options to receive text message reminders. The findings of this review suggest a high average retention rate of 79% in studies involving various DHIs.

conclusionsThe development of DHIs is increasing and may be of interest to CYP, particularly in the area of MH treatment. With continuous technological advancements, it is important to know which modalities may increase engagement and help CYP who are facing MH problems. This review identified the existing modalities and highlighted the influencing factors from the perspective of CYP. This knowledge provides information that can be used to design and evaluate new interventions and offers important theoretical insights into how and why CYP engage in DHIs.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthPsychotherapyTelemedicineYoung Adultadolescent mental healthchildreneHealthmHealthmobile phonesmartphonetechnology

Identifiers

PMID32442160
PMCPMC7381028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.