Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32442154›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Feasibility and Utility of mHealth for the Remote Monitoring of Parkinson Disease: Ancillary Study of the PD_manager Randomized Controlled Trial.

Dimitris Gatsios, Angelo Antonini, Giovanni Gentile, Andrea Marcante, Clelia Pellicano, Lucia Macchiusi, Francesca Assogna, Gianfranco Spalletta, Heather Gage, Morro Touray and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Economic evaluation of mHealth solutions in PD: where do we stand?Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Dimitris GatsiosDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3006-1587
Angelo AntoniniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1040-2807
Giovanni GentileDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6393-2655
Andrea MarcanteSan Camillo Hospital Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0869-6175
Clelia PellicanoLaboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Fondazione Santa Lucia Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3272-1094
Lucia MacchiusiLaboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Fondazione Santa Lucia Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-2397
Francesca AssognaLaboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Fondazione Santa Lucia Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4315-7879
Gianfranco SpallettaLaboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Fondazione Santa Lucia Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7432-4249
Heather GageSurrey Health Economics Centre, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2049-9406
Morro TouraySurrey Health Economics Centre, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1509-6194
Lada TimotijevicSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3154-0048
Charo HodgkinsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4775-0338
Maria ChondrogiorgiDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0537-3714
George RigasUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information System, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5102-6185
Dimitrios I FotiadisUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information System, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7362-5082
Spyridon KonitsiotisDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5217-1317
University of Ioannina · GRFondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Padua · ITIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health, predominantly wearable technology and mobile apps, have been considered in Parkinson disease to provide valuable ecological data between face-to-face visits and improve monitoring of motor symptoms remotely.

objectiveWe explored the feasibility of using a technology-based mHealth platform comprising a smartphone in combination with a smartwatch and a pair of smart insoles, described in this study as the PD_manager system, to collect clinically meaningful data. We also explored outcomes and disease-related factors that are important determinants to establish feasibility. Finally, we further validated a tremor evaluation method with data collected while patients performed their daily activities.

methodsPD_manager trial was an open-label parallel group randomized study.The mHealth platform consists of a wristband, a pair of sensor insoles, a smartphone (with dedicated mobile Android apps) and a knowledge platform serving as the cloud backend. Compliance was assessed with statistical analysis and the factors affecting it using appropriate regression analysis. The correlation of the scores of our previous algorithm for tremor evaluation and the respective Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale estimations by clinicians were explored.

resultsOf the 75 study participants, 65 (87%) completed the protocol. They used the PD_manager system for a median 11.57 (SD 3.15) days. Regression analysis suggests that the main factor associated with high use was caregivers' burden. Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living and patients' self-rated health status also influence the system's use. Our algorithm provided clinically meaningful data for the detection and evaluation of tremor.

conclusionsWe found that PD patients, regardless of their demographics and disease characteristics, used the system for 11 to 14 days. The study further supports that mHealth can be an effective tool for the ecologically valid, passive, unobtrusive monitoring and evaluation of symptoms. Future studies will be required to demonstrate that an mHealth platform can improve disease management and care.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN17396879; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17396879. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-2767-4.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsParkinson DiseaseTelemedicineAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSmartphoneclinically meaningful datadeterminants of complianceecological validityParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID32442154
PMCPMC7367523
OpenAlexW3005271815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.