Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32441987›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2020

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials.

Dustin C Krutsinger, Kelly L O'Leary, Susan S Ellenberg, Cody E Cotner, Scott D Halpern, Katherine R Courtright

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Update in Critical Care 2020.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dustin C KrutsingerDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-7304
Kelly L O'LearyChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Susan S EllenbergDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics.
Cody E CotnerPerelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Scott D HalpernDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics.
Katherine R CourtrightPalliative and Advanced Illness Research Center.ORCID 0000-0003-3572-9857
Institute of Health Economics · CAChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biostatistics · CHUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Training in Critical Care Health Policy ResearchT32HL098054 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
Improving the fairness of RCTs among patients with acute and chronic respiratory failureK24HL143289 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2018 to 2026
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL143289NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalEconomics, BehavioralInformed ConsentPatient SelectionAdultAgedCritical CareFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Insufficiencyacute respiratory failurebehavioral economicsinformed consent

Identifiers

PMID32441987
PMCPMC7462327
OpenAlexW3026524644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.