[Rehabilitation in the time of COVID-19].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Specialized Rehabilitation Centers (CER) in the SUS and the impact of the covid-19 pandemic.Revista de saude publica · 2023
   Article
2. [Coronavirus disease 2019 crisis. The challenge to take the final step to telerehabilitation].Rehabilitacion
   Article
3. [Fighting against COVID-19: clinical activities of spanish rehabilitation physicians: A cross-sectional study].Rehabilitacion
   Article
4. Telemedicine in pulmonary rehabilitation - benefits of a telerehabilitation program in post-COVID-19 patients: a controlled quasi-experimental study.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
   Article
5. [The future of neurorehabilitation after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic].Neurologia
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as