Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32441245›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2020

Discriminating the severity of pharyngeal collapsibility in men using anthropometric and polysomnographic indices.

Pedro R Genta, Fabiola Schorr, Bradley A Edwards, Andrew Wellman, Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The upper airway in obstructive sleep apnoea: state of the art.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. OSA Upper Airways Surgery: A Targeted Approach.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pedro R GentaLaboratorio do Sono, LIM 63, Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiola SchorrLaboratorio do Sono, LIM 63, Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Bradley A EdwardsSleep and Circadian Medicine Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew WellmanDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Geraldo Lorenzi-FilhoLaboratorio do Sono, LIM 63, Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesAlthough obstructive sleep apnea results from the combination of different pathophysiologic mechanisms, the degree of anatomical compromise remains the main responsible factor. The passive pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit) is a technique used to assess the collapsibility of the upper airway and is often used as a surrogate measure of this anatomical compromise. Patients with a low Pcrit (ie, less collapsible airway) are potential candidates for non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies. However, Pcrit determination is a technically complex method not available in clinical practice. We hypothesized that the discrimination between low and high Pcrit can be estimated from simple anthropometric and polysomnographic indices.

methodsMen with and without obstructive sleep apnea underwent Pcrit determination and full polysomnography. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to select the best cutoff of each variable to predict a high Pcrit (Pcrit ≥ 2.5 cmH₂O). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to create a clinical score to predict a high Pcrit.

resultsWe studied 81 men, 48 ± 13 years of age, with an apnea-hypopnea index of 32 [14-60], range 1-96 events/h), and Pcrit of -0.7 ± 3.1 (range, -9.1 to +7.2 cmH₂O). A high and low Pcrit could be accurately identified by polysomnographic and anthropometric indices. A score to discriminate Pcrit showed good performance (area under the curve = 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.00) and included waist circumference, non-rapid eye movement obstructive apnea index/apnea-hypopnea index, mean obstructive apnea duration, and rapid eye movement apnea-hypopnea index.

conclusionsA low Pcrit (less collapsible) can be estimated from a simple clinical score. This approach may identify candidates more likely to respond to non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.

Indexed as

PharynxSleep Apnea, ObstructiveHumansMalePolysomnographyPressureSleep, REManthropometryobstructive sleep apneapharyngeal critical closing pressurepolysomnography

Identifiers

PMID32441245
PMCPMC7970603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.