Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32441197›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Comanagement of Risk Factors in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the APPEAR Study.

Vittal Hejjaji, Kensey Gosch, Philip G Jones, Tracie Breeding, John A Spertus, Suzanne V Arnold

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vittal HejjajiSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
Kensey GoschSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
Philip G JonesSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
Tracie BreedingSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
John A SpertusSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
Suzanne V ArnoldSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.
Saint Luke's Hospital · US

Funding

CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL110837 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI JOHN A SPERTUS · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Effective management of cardiovascular risk factors is the foundation of secondary prevention in coronary artery disease. The physician under whose sphere these are managed can vary, primary care physicians, cardiologists, or both, and the optimal management strategy for risk factor control is unknown. Methods and Results The APPEAR (Angina Prevalence and Provider Evaluation of Angina Relief) study was a cross-sectional cohort study of outpatients with coronary artery disease (stable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or myocardial infarction) from 25 US cardiology practices. After each patient visit, providers noted who managed each risk factor. Blood pressure and lipid levels were recorded from charts. We compared adherence to guideline-directed risk factor control between management strategies (primary care physician alone, cardiologist alone, or comanaged). Among 1259 outpatients with coronary artery disease (mean [SD] age, 71 [11.1] years; 69% men), blood pressure and lipid management strategy varied. Mean blood pressure was 127.9/72.3 mm Hg, with 74% of patients at <140/90 mm Hg and 46% at <130/80 mm Hg. Mean low-density lipoprotein was 83.5 mg/dL, with 75% of patients at <100 mg/dL and 91% on appropriate statin therapy. Patients managed by cardiologists alone tended to have higher rates of risk factor control for both blood pressure and lipids, even after adjusting for covariates. Conclusions Although comanagement has shown benefit in some clinical situations, we found that risk factor control in patients with coronary artery disease tended to be poorer when care was shared between cardiologists and primary care physicians. Further research is needed to better define which conditions are best comanaged and how to more effectively comanage patients in the fractured US healthcare system.

Indexed as

CardiologistsPhysicians, Primary CareSecondary PreventionAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDyslipidemiasFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscomanagementrisk factorssecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID32441197
PMCPMC7428978
OpenAlexW3027873256

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.