Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440990›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022

A preliminary evaluation of a high temporal resolution data-driven motion correction algorithm for rubidium-82 on a SiPM PET-CT system.

Ian S Armstrong, Charles Hayden, Matthew J Memmott, Parthiban Arumugam

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian S ArmstrongNuclear Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. Ian.Armstrong@mft.nhs.uk.
Charles HaydenMolecular Imaging, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Knoxville, TN, USA.
Matthew J MemmottNuclear Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
Parthiban ArumugamNuclear Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn myocardial perfusion PET, images are acquired during vasodilator stress, increasing the likelihood of intra-frame motion blurring of the heart in reconstructed static images to assess relative perfusion. This work evaluated a prototype data-driven motion correction (DDMC) algorithm designed specifically for cardiac PET.

methodsA cardiac torso phantom, with a solid defect, was scanned stationary and being manually pulled to-and-fro in the axial direction with a random motion. Non-motion-corrected (NMC) and DDMC images were reconstructed. Total perfusion deficit was measured in the defect and profiles through the cardiac insert were defined. In addition, 46 static perfusion images from 36 rubidium-82 MPI patients were selected based upon a perception of motion blurring in the images. NMC and DDMC images were reconstructed, blinded, and scored on image quality and perceived motion.

resultsPhantom data demonstrated near-perfect recovery of myocardial wall visualization and defect quantification with DDMC compared with the stationary phantom. Quality of clinical images was NMC: 10 non-diagnostic, 31 adequate, and 5 good; DDMC images: 0 non-diagnostic, 6 adequate, and 40 good.

conclusionThe DDMC algorithm shows great promise in rubidium MPI PET with substantial improvements in image quality and the potential to salvage images considered non-diagnostic due to significant motion blurring.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMotionPhantoms, ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRubidium RadioisotopesRubidium-82Rubidium RadioisotopesImage analysisImage interpretationImage reconstructionMPIPET

Identifiers

PMID32440990
PMCPMC8873161
OpenAlexW3028468450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.