Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440962›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2020

Middle and Distal Common Carotid Artery Stenting: Long-Term Patency Rates and Risk Factors for In-Stent Restenosis.

Miklós Vértes, Dat T Nguyen, György Székely, Ákos Bérczi, Edit Dósa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miklós VértesHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Street 68, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Dat T NguyenHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Street 68, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
György SzékelyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Street 68, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Ákos BércziHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Street 68, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Edit DósaHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Street 68, Budapest, 1122, Hungary. drdosaedit@gmail.com.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the absence of literature data, we aimed to determine the long-term patency rates of middle/distal common carotid artery (CCA) stenting and to investigate predisposing factors in the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR). MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-one patients (30 males, median age 63.5 years), who underwent stenting with 51 self-expandable stents for significant (≥ 60%) stenosis of the middle/distal CCA, were analyzed retrospectively. Patient (atherosclerotic risk factors, comorbidities, medications), vessel (elongation), lesion (stenosis grade, length, calcification, location), and stent characteristics (material, diameter, length, fracture) were examined. Duplex ultrasonography was used to monitor stent patency. The Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and a log-rank test were used statistically.

resultsThe median follow-up time was 35 months (interquartile range, 20-102 months). Significant (≥ 70%) ISR developed in 14 patients (27.5%; stenosis, N = 10; entire CCA occlusion, N = 4). Primary patency rates were 98%, 92%, 83%, 73%, and 61% at 6, 12, 24, 60, and 96 months, respectively. Reintervention was performed in six patients (11.8%) with nonocclusive ISR. Secondary patency rates were 100% at 6 and 12 months and 96% at 24, 60, and 96 months. In-stent restenosis developed more frequently (P < .001) in patients with hyperlipidemia; primary patency rates were also significantly worse (Chi-square, 11.08; degrees of freedom, 1; P < .001) in patients with hyperlipidemia compared to those without.

conclusionStenting of the middle/distal CCA can be performed with acceptable patency rates. If intervention is unequivocally needed, patients with hyperlipidemia will require closer follow-up care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Local non-random sample.

Indexed as

StentsVascular PatencyAgedArterial Occlusive DiseasesCarotid Artery, CommonConstriction, PathologicDiagnostic ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentCarotid arteryHyperlipidemiaIn-stent restenosisStent fractureStenting

Identifiers

PMID32440962
PMCPMC7369259
OpenAlexW3027328485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.