Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440941›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2020

Nutrition Disparities and Cardiovascular Health.

George A Mensah, Alison G M Brown, Charlotte A Pratt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The role of behavioral science in addressing cardiovascular health disparities: A narrative review of efforts, challenges, and future directions.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

George A MensahCenter for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 6070, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. George.Mensah@nih.gov.
Alison G M BrownDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, NHLBI, NIH, 6710 Rockledge Drive, Suite 10115, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Charlotte A PrattDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, NHLBI, NIH, 6710 Rockledge Drive, Suite 10115, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review is an assessment of the state of the science on nutrition disparities and their contribution to disparities in cardiovascular health. RECENT

findingsNutrition disparities remain pervasive by race/ethnicity, sex/gender, socioeconomic status, and geography. They are rooted in differences in social, cultural, and environmental determinants of health, behavioral and lifestyle factors, and the impact of policy interventions. Systematic differences in diet quality, dietary patterns, and nutrient intakes contribute to cardiovascular disparities and are mediated by microbiota, and CVD risk factors including high levels of blood pressure, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and glucose; oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and endothelial dysfunction. Despite the progress made in nutrition research, important gaps persist that signal the need for more effective interventions at multiple levels to reduce cardiovascular disparities. Research opportunities include (1) exploring the gene-nutrient-environment interactions in the context of ancestral diversity; (2) investigating the causal link between diet and gut microbiota and impact of social determinants of health; (3) understanding resilience; (4) testing the effectiveness of multi-level interventions that address social and environmental determinants; and (4) supporting intervention research informed by validated implementation science frameworks.

Indexed as

DietNutritional StatusBlack or African AmericanCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMexican AmericansObesityQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRisk FactorsCardiovascular diseaseEthnicityGeographyNutrition disparitiesRaceSocial determinantsSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID32440941
OpenAlexW3028312508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.