Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440914›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

The importance of adjuvant treatment and primary anatomical site in head and neck basaloid squamous cell carcinoma survival: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

J Gootee, M Patel, S Aurit, P Silberstein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J GooteeCreighton University School of Medicine, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE, 68178, USA. JonathanGootee@creighton.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0260-9189
M PatelCreighton University School of Medicine, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE, 68178, USA.
S AuritDivision of Clinical Research and Evaluative Sciences, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
P SilbersteinDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Creighton University · USCHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBasaloid squamous cell carcinoma (BSCC) of the head and neck is an aggressive and highly malignant variant of squamous cell carcinoma that accounts for 2% of head and neck cancers. Previous studies have not analyzed the significance of adjuvant chemoradiation and anatomical site within BSCC subtype and its impact on survival.

methodsA cohort of 1999 patients with BSCC of the head and neck was formed from the National Cancer Database and analyzed with descriptive studies, median survival and 5- and 10-year survival. A multivariable Cox hazard regression was performed to determine the prognostic significance of anatomical site and adjuvant therapy.

resultsThe most common primary anatomical site was the oropharynx (71.9%) followed by oral cavity (11.5%), larynx (10.1%), hypopharynx (3.5%), esophagus (1.9%), and nasopharynx (1.1%). The presence of metastasis increased the risk of mortality (HR = 2.14; 95% CI 1.40-3.26). Tumors localized to the oropharynx demonstrated better survival compared to all sites except nasopharynx, including the oral cavity (HR = 2.45; 95% CI 1.83-3.29), hypopharynx (HR = 2.58; 95% CI:1.64-4.05), and larynx (HR = 2.89; 95% CI:2.25-3.73). Adjuvant chemoradiation (HR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.23-0.58) and adjuvant radiation (HR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.23-0.64) had better survival outcomes compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with microscopic margins had better survival outcomes when compared to no surgery (HR = 0.38, 98% Cl 0.23-0.64) while there were no better survival outcomes of patients with macroscopic margins compared to no surgery.

conclusionThis study illustrated that tumors in the oropharynx, lower age, adjuvant chemoradiation and radiation, and microscopic margins were associated with greater survival.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansHypopharyngeal NeoplasmsInfantInfant, NewbornKaplan-Meier EstimateAdjuvant therapyAnatomical siteBasaloid squamous cell carcinomaNCDBSurvival

Identifiers

PMID32440914
OpenAlexW3028347312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.