Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440855›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2021

Tools Appraisal of Organizational Factors Associated with Return-to-Work in Workers on Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal and Common Mental Disorders: A Systematic Search and Review.

Patrizia Villotti, Andrea Gragnano, Christian Larivière, Alessia Negrini, Clermont E Dionne, Marc Corbière

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrizia VillottiCareer counselling - Department of Education, Université du Québec à Montréal, 1205 rue St-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 3R9, Canada. villotti.patrizia@uqam.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4528-6340
Andrea GragnanoDepartment of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Christian LarivièreInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, Montréal, Canada.
Alessia NegriniInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, Montréal, Canada.
Clermont E DionneDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Marc CorbièreCareer counselling - Department of Education, Université du Québec à Montréal, 1205 rue St-Denis, Montréal, QC, H2X 3R9, Canada.
Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The objective of this study was to identify organizational factors that are predictive of return-to-work (RTW) among workers with musculoskeletal (MSD) and common mental disorders (CMD), and to subsequently catalogue and characterize the questionnaires (tools) used to measure them. Methods A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO library databases and grey literature was conducted. First, a list of organizational factors predictive of RTW for the two populations considered was built. Second, the questionnaires used to measure these factors were retrieved. Third, we looked in the scientific literature for studies on the psychometric properties and practical relevance of these questionnaires. Results Among the factors retained, perceived social support from supervisor and co-workers, work accommodations, and job strain were identified as common RTW factors. Other risk/protective factors, and associated tools, specifically targeting either people with MSD or CMD were also analysed. Conclusions Researchers and practitioners are often uncertain of which tools to use to measure organizational factors which can facilitate or hinder RTW. This study provides an evaluation of the tools measuring predictive organizational RTW factors in people with MSD and CMD. The identified tools can be used in everyday practice and/or research.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSick LeaveHumansReturn to WorkSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesCommon mental disordersMeasurement toolsMusculoskeletal disordersOrganizational factorsReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID32440855
OpenAlexW3028034024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.