Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440792›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2020

The relationship between monoaminergic gene expression, learning, and optimism in red junglefowl chicks.

Robert Boddington, Clara A Gómez Dunlop, Laura C Garnham, Sara Ryding, Robin N Abbey-Lee, Anastasia Kreshchenko, Hanne Løvlie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular biology of serotonergic systems in avian brains.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Robert BoddingtonDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Clara A Gómez DunlopDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Laura C GarnhamDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Sara RydingDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Robin N Abbey-LeeDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Anastasia KreshchenkoDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Hanne LøvlieDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. hanne.lovlie@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4352-6275
Linköping University · SE

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2015-11891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-species cognitive variation is commonly observed, but explanations for why individuals within a species differ in cognition are still understudied and not yet clear. Cognitive processes are likely influenced by genetic differences, with genes in the monoaminergic systems predicted to be important. To explore the potential role of these genes in association with individual variation in cognition, we exposed red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) chicks to behavioural assays measuring variation in learning (discriminative learning, reversal learning, and cognitive flexibility) and optimism (measured in a cognitive judgement bias test). Following this, we analysed prefrontal cortex gene expression of several dopaminergic and serotonergic genes in these chicks. Of our explored genes, serotonin receptor genes 5HT2A and 5HT2B, and dopaminergic receptor gene DRD1 were associated with measured behaviour. Chicks that had higher 5HT2A were less flexible in the reversal learning task, and chicks with higher 5HT2B also tended to be less cognitively flexible. Additionally, chicks with higher DRD1 were more optimistic, whilst chicks with higher 5HT2A tended to be less optimistic. These results suggest that the serotonergic and dopaminergic systems are linked to observed cognitive variation, and, thus, individual differences in cognition can be partially explained by variation in brain gene expression.

Indexed as

ChickensCognitionAnimalsBrainDiscrimination LearningReversal LearningAnimal cognitionAssociative learningCognitive flexibilityDopamineGallus gallusJudgement biasSerotonin

Identifiers

PMID32440792
PMCPMC7415762
OpenAlexW3027074136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.