Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440762›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2020

Evaluation of NUC-1031: a first-in-class ProTide in biliary tract cancer.

Mansi Arora, James M Bogenberger, Amro Abdelrahman, Jennifer L Leiting, Xianfeng Chen, Jan B Egan, Aradhana Kasimsetty, Elzbieta Lenkiewicz, Smriti Malasi, Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson and 8 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. In Vivo Models for Cholangiocarcinoma-What Can We Learn for Human Disease?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. NUC-1031 in biliary tract cancer: from bench to bedside and back?Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mansi AroraDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
James M BogenbergerDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Amro AbdelrahmanDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jennifer L LeitingDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Xianfeng ChenDepartment of Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Jan B EganCenter for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Aradhana KasimsettyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Elzbieta LenkiewiczDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Smriti MalasiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Pedro Luiz Serrano UsonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Bolni Marius NagaloDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Yumei ZhouDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Marcela A SalomaoDepartment of Lab Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Heidi E KosiorekDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Esteban BraggioDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Michael T BarrettDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Mark J TrutyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mitesh J BoradDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. Borad.Mitesh@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-2658
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Project 4: ImmunovirotherapyP50CA210964 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MARK A. MC NIVEN · 2018 to 2026
$20.5M
cGAS-STING Pathway Targeting Replicative Adenoviruses with CD46 Tropism and AFP Promoter Conditional Replication Restriction for the Treatment of Hepatocellular CarcinomaK01CA234324 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI NAGALO, BOLNI MARIUS · 2018 to 2022
$667k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA234324NCI NIH HHS P50 CA210964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNUC1031 is a first-in-class ProTide, that is a gemcitabine pro-drug designed to overcome putative mechanisms of resistance, including decreased expression of hENT/hCNT transporters, absence of activating enzymes such as deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) and presence of degrading enzymes such as cytidine deaminase (CDA). We undertook comprehensive pre-clinical evaluation of NUC1031 in biliary tract cancer (BTC) models, given that gemcitabine/cisplatin is a standard first-line therapy in advanced BTC.

methodsHere, we compared the in vitro activity of NUC1031 in comparison to gemcitabine, validate putative mechanism(s) of action, assessed potential biomarkers of sensitivity or resistance, and performed combination studies with cisplatin. We also evaluated the in vivo efficacy of NUC1031 and gemcitabine using a CDA-high cholangiocarcinoma patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model.

resultsIn a panel of BTC cell lines (N = 10), NUC1031 had less potency than gemcitabine in multiple cellular assays. NUC1031 did not demonstrate evidence of greater synergy over gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin. Surprisingly, efficacy of both gemcitabine and NUC1031 was not found to be correlated with hENT/hCTN, dCK or CDA transcript levels. Gemcitabine and NUC1031 showed equivalent efficacy in a CDA-high PDX model in vivo contradicting the primary rationale of NUC1031 design.

conclusionNUC1031 did not exhibit evidence of superior activity over gemcitabine, as a single-agent, or in combination with cisplatin, in either our in vivo or in vitro BTC models. Given that the largest Phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0314666) to date in BTC is underway (N = 828) comparing NUC1031/cisplatin to gemcitabine/cisplatin, our results suggest that a more conservative clinical evaluation path would be more appropriate.

Indexed as

Drug SynergismAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisBiliary Tract NeoplasmsCell ProliferationCisplatinCytidine MonophosphateDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDTumor Cells, CulturedCisplatinCytidine MonophosphateDeoxycytidineGemcitabineNUC-1031CholangiocarcinomaCisplatinGemcitabinePhosphoramidatePro-drug

Identifiers

PMID32440762
OpenAlexW3027370039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.