Trial reportInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020
Evaluation of a collaborative care program for pulmonary hypertension patients: a multicenter randomized trial.
Trial report in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01038284 (Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Collaboration Care Program in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Collaboration Care Program in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medication adherence, related factors and outcomes among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Pooled it
- Patient Preferences for Pharmacy Services: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Discrete Choice Experiments.The patient · 2024Pooled it
- Intervention of pharmacist included in multidisciplinary team to reduce adverse drug event: a qualitative systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Quality of Pulmonary Hypertension Care Within Expert PH Centers: Patient and Provider Perspectives From a Multi-Site Qualitative Study.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Navigating the Complexities of Pulmonary Hypertension Care: Unique Challenges in PAH Management.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pulmonary hypertension is a rare, chronic and life-threatening group of diseases. Recent advances in pulmonary hypertension management prolong survival and improve quality-of-life. However, highly complex drug therapy enhances the risk of drug-related problems. Objective To assess the impact of involving clinical pharmacists in the collaborative care of pulmonary hypertension patients. Setting Ten French University Hospital Pneumology departments, all members of the French Network for Pulmonary Hypertension. Methods This prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial included incident pulmonary hypertension patients who were followed-up for 18 months. Randomization using an adapted Zelen method allocated patients to collaborative care (n = 41) or usual care groups (n = 51). A collaborative care program involving clinical pharmacists was developed through a close partnership between with physicians, nurses and pharmacists. Besides usual care, the program includes regular one-to-one interviews between the pharmacist and the patient. These interviews had following objectives: to perform an exhaustive medication history review; to identify the patient' needs, knowledge and skills; to define educational objectives and to provide patients with relevant information when needed. Following each interview, a standardized report form containing the pharmacist's recommendations was provided to physicians and nurses and discussed collaboratively. An ancillary economic analysis was performed. Main outcome measure Number of drug-related problems and their outcomes. Results The number of drug-related problems was not significantly different between groups (1.6 ± 1.5 vs. 1.9 ± 2.4; p = 0.41). More problems were resolved in the collaborative care group than in the usual care group (86.5% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.01). Time to clinical worsening, therapeutic adherence, satisfaction or quality-of-life were not statistically different between groups. Collaborative care decreased costs of drug-related hospitalizations. Conclusion Including clinical pharmacists in the multidisciplinary care of hospitalized patients with pulmonary hypertension improved the outcome of drug-related problems and reduced the costs of related hospitalization. However, we observed no efficacy on medication errors, clinical outcomes or medication adherence. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01038284.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.