Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440658›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2020

GeneMark-EP+: eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins.

Tomáš Brůna, Alexandre Lomsadze, Mark Borodovsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 388 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
388citing papers in PubMed
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

388 citing papers in PubMed, 577 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distinct YY dinucleotide periodicity in adeno-associated virus DNA.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

328 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomáš BrůnaSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Alexandre LomsadzeWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Mark BorodovskySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

NIGMS Administrative Supplements to Support Undergraduate Summer ResearchR01GM128145 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORODOVSKY, MARK · 2018 to 2021
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have made several steps toward creating a fast and accurate algorithm for gene prediction in eukaryotic genomes. First, we introduced an automated method for efficient

Identifiers

PMID32440658
PMCPMC7222226
OpenAlexW3025319533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.