Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440494›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2020

The efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with bisphosphonates: A review.

Yilin Zhu, Zhonglian Huang, Yan Wang, Weicai Xu, Hongjiang Chen, Jiankun Xu, Shaowei Luo, Yuantao Zhang, Di Zhao, Jun Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Mechanism and Experimental Verification ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yilin ZhuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Zhonglian HuangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, China.
Weicai XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Hongjiang ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Jiankun XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Shaowei LuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Yuantao ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Di ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Jun HuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Shantou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of denosumab therapy in osteoporotic postmenopausal women who were previously treated with bisphosphonates.

methodsMeta-analyses of four available randomised controlled trials that compared osteoporotic patients who switched to denosumab from bisphosphonates (n ​= ​1416) and those who continued bisphosphonates therapy (n ​= ​1411) were included.

resultsThe increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of both the spine and hip was significantly higher in patients who shifted to denosumab than in those who continued bisphosphonates. Despite the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and fractures being comparable, treatment withdrawal owing to AEs was significantly less frequent in the denosumab group.

conclusionThe outcomes and treatment compliance were improved in postmenopausal osteoporotic women who shifted to denosumab from bisphosphonates. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: The replacement of bisphosphonates with denosumab may lead to better therapeutic efficacy and fewer adherence barriers ​than those with continued usage of bisphosphonates, which in the future may guide the choice of drug therapy in clinics.

Indexed as

BisphosphonateDenosumabMeta-analysisOsteoporosisPostmenopausal osteoporosisRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32440494
PMCPMC7231967
OpenAlexW2972420673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.