ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020
Hemi-tongue Allograft Transplantation in Dogs.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen complete recovery of tongue function following tumor excision is desired, reestablishment of the complex movements of the tongue is necessary. However, currently available methods for recovery of tongue function, such as flap surgery or prosthesis insertion, are inadequate. In the current study, we investigated the effects of transplantations of tongue allografts.
methodsHemi-tongue allotransplantation procedures were performed with 8 pairs of sex-blind and unrelated beagle dogs. In each donor, the right side of the tongue, including the lingual and hypoglossal nerves, extrinsic muscles of the tongue, mucous membrane of the oral floor, lingual artery, and vein were exposed. A vascularized transplantation method was used with manual anastomosis of the blood vessels and nerves.
resultsSurvival of the grafted tongue was only noted in 1 dog that died 5 days after transplantation. We suspected that the death was due to nutritional deficiency or dehydration, rather than hyperacute rejection of the transplant or technical failure of the microsurgical anastomosis. The grafted tongue was partially connected to the side of the recipient tongue, and lymphocyte infiltration was observed in this dog.
conclusionsPostoperative management is difficult in dogs. Even if tongue allograft including nerves and extrinsic muscles is performed, it seems to take a long time before the tongue recovers its functions. Furthermore, expansive tongue allograft was too invasive a treatment for animals. If we want to adapt this procedure to humans, the first trial in a human will be done without animal experiments, as was the case with face transplantations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.