Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440413›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2020

Functional Validation of a New Alginate-based Hydrogel Scaffold Combined with Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rat Hard Palate Cleft Model.

Marie Naudot, Julien Davrou, Az-Eddine Djebara, Anaïs Barre, Nolwenn Lavagen, Sandrine Lardière, Soufiane Zakaria Azdad, Luciane Zabijak, Stéphane Lack, Bernard Devauchelle and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for Cleft Defects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Use of stem cells in bone regeneration in cleft palate patients: review and recommendations.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marie NaudotResearch Unit 7516, CHIMERE, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Julien DavrouResearch Unit 7516, CHIMERE, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Az-Eddine DjebaraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Anaïs BarreResearch Unit 7516, CHIMERE, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Nolwenn LavagenResearch Unit 7516, CHIMERE, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Sandrine LardièreR&D Department, Les Laboratoires Brothier, Nanterre, France.
Soufiane Zakaria AzdadDepartment of Pathology and Cytology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Luciane ZabijakPlatform ICAP, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Stéphane LackR&D Department, Les Laboratoires Brothier, Nanterre, France.
Bernard DevauchelleResearch Unit 7516, CHIMERE, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Jean-Pierre MarolleauResearch Unit 4666, HEMATIM, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Sophie Le RicousseResearch Unit 7516, CHIMERE, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRChirurgie et extrémité céphalique, caractérisation morphologique et fonctionnelle · FRBrothier (France) · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the major difficulties in cleft palate repair is the requirement for several surgical procedures and autologous bone grafting to form a bony bridge across the cleft defect. Engineered tissue, composed of a biomaterial scaffold and multipotent stem cells, may be a useful alternative for minimizing the non-negligible risk of donor site morbidity. The present study was designed to confirm the healing and osteogenic properties of a novel alginate-based hydrogel in palate repair.

methodsMatrix constructs, seeded with allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) or not, were incorporated into a surgically created, critical-sized cleft palate defect in the rat. Control with no scaffold was also tested. Bone formation was assessed using microcomputed tomography at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 and a histologic analysis at week 12.

resultsAt 12 weeks, the proportion of bone filling associated with the use of hydrogel scaffold alone did not differ significantly from the values observed in the scaffold-free experiment (61.01% ± 5.288% versus 36.91% ± 5.132%;

conclusionsIn a relevant in vivo model of cleft palate in the rat, we confirmed the alginate-based hydrogel's biocompatibility and real advantages for tissue healing. Addition of BM-MSCs stimulated bone formation in the center of the implant, demonstrating the new biomaterial's potential for use as a bone substitute grafting material for cleft palate repair.

Identifiers

PMID32440413
PMCPMC7209877
OpenAlexW3022784264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.