ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2020
Aligned 3D porous polyurethane scaffolds for biological anisotropic tissue regeneration.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repairing spinal cord injuries: The most promising polymeric biomaterials and local drug delivery.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Engineering of tissue in microphysiological systems demonstrated by modelling skeletal muscle.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Advancements in skeletal muscle tissue engineering: strategies for repair and regeneration of skeletal muscle beyond self-repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Aligned Collagen Sponges with Tunable Pore Size for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Topographic Orientation of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration: Recent Advances in Biomaterial Design and Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Rational design of biodegradable thermoplastic polyurethanes for tissue repair.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- 'Invisible' orthodontics by polymeric 'clear' aligners molded on 3D-printed personalized dental models.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- Recent advances in regenerative biomaterials.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Review
- Enhanced BMP-2-Mediated Bone Repair Using an Anisotropic Silk Fibroin Scaffold Coated with Bone-like Apatite.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Glycosaminoglycan-Based Cryogels as Scaffolds for Cell Cultivation and Tissue Regeneration.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Anisotropic mineralized collagen scaffolds accelerate osteogenic response in a glycosaminoglycan-dependent fashion.RSC advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A green fabrication process (organic solvent-free) of artificial scaffolds is required in tissue engineering field. In this work, a series of aligned three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds are made from biodegradable waterborne polyurethane (PU) emulsion via directional freeze-drying method to ensure no organic byproducts. After optimizing the concentration of polymer in the emulsion and investigating different freezing temperatures, an aligned PUs scaffold (PU14) generated from 14 wt% polymer content and processed at -196°C was selected based on the desired oriented porous structure (pore size of 32.5 ± 9.3 μm, porosity of 92%) and balanced mechanical properties both in the horizontal direction (strength of 41.3 kPa, modulus of 72.3 kPa) and in the vertical direction (strength of 45.5 kPa, modulus of 139.3 kPa). The response of L929 cells and the regeneration of muscle tissue demonstrated that such pure material-based aligned 3D scaffold can facilitate the development of orientated cells and anisotropic tissue regeneration both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.