ArticleTanaffos2019
Serum Procalcitonin Level as a Predictor of Bacterial Infection in Patients with COPD Exacerbation.
Article in Tanaffos, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers to guide the use of antibiotics for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD): a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Antibiotic use and consumption among medical patients of two hospitals in Sierra Leone: a descriptive report.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the world. Although the cause of COPD exacerbations can be bacterial or viral, use of antibiotics in exacerbations remains controversial. Procalcitonin serum level dramatically increases in bacterial infections, but not in viral or noninfectious febrile diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the measurement of procalcitonin can be used to differentiate bacterial from non-bacterial causes of COPD exacerbations. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty-eight COPD patients admitted to the emergency department of Masih Daneshvari Hospital due to COPD exacerbation were studied. At admission and before prescribing antibiotics, we obtained sputum and blood samples for sputum gram staining and culture and measured serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. All results were analyzed by SPSS software version 22.
resultsA total of 68 patients including 51 males and 17 females were studied. From 38.2% of patients a respiratory pathogen was isolated from their sputum and 23.5% of patients had elevated serum procalcitonin values. Using Fisher exact test, we found strong correlation between elevated procalcitonin levels above 0.5 ng/ml and sputum culture results (P < 0.01). We also found strong correlation between elevated procalcitonin levels above 0.5 ng/ml with abnormal C-reactive protein levels in a group of patients with positive sputum culture, using Fisher exact test (P <0.01).
conclusionAs sputum culture and microbiologic studies are time consuming and sometimes expensive, it seems that procalcitonin could be a reliable marker of bacterial infection in COPD exacerbation, although we recommend a larger study with larger sample to consolidate the finding of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32440298PMC7230128W3027730018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.