Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440287›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2020

Distance assessment of detours by jumping spiders.

Samuel Aguilar-Arguello, Daniel Gerhard, Ximena J Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel Aguilar-ArguelloSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
Daniel GerhardSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
Ximena J NelsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4301-2928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To take an indirect route (detour) in order to reach a specific target requires complex cognitive processes. Yet more demanding, from the cognitive point of view, is when the goal is only visible at the beginning of the detour. In spiders from the family Salticidae, vision is a key sensory modality mediating navigation and prey search. Their acute vision allows them to perform complicated detours, possibly as a consequence of the multitude of potential routes in their typically complex 3-dimensional habitats. We used a 4-route choice test, in which routes differed in being either short or long and in the presence or absence of a lure of a prey item, to investigate route assessment in 2 salticid species,

Indexed as

cognitioncognitive limitationsdecision-makingdetour behaviorSalticidaespatial task

Identifiers

PMID32440287
PMCPMC7234261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.