ArticlePragmatic and observational research2020
Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Tadalafil in Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Japanese Post-Marketing Surveillance Study.
Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discontinuation Rates of Tadalafil Alone and in Combination with a-Blockers in the Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms with or without Coexisting Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Pooled it
- Safety profile and signal detection of tadalafil: a real-world analysis based on the Food and Drug adverse event reporting system.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing post-marketing safety of PDE5Is in erectile dysfunction: real-world evidence from the FDA adverse event reporting system.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of tadalafil in Japanese men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in real-world clinical practice; and to investigate the safety profile in patients aged ≥75 years. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter, post-marketing surveillance study in which Japanese patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia were observed for up to 18 months after initiating tadalafil treatment. The real-world safety and effectiveness outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-treatment or the last day of treatment.
resultsMost patients received tadalafil 5 mg per day throughout the observation period. Among 1393 patients analyzed for safety, the overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was 8.3%. These adverse drug reactions were generally consistent with the known safety profile of tadalafil and no new safety risks were identified in long-term use. There was no statistical difference in the frequency of adverse drug reactions between patients aged <75 and ≥75 years. The mean change in total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS-quality of life subscore was significantly improved at each timepoint. At 18 months, IPSS had improved by 5.0 points (
conclusionThis surveillance demonstrated that tadalafil has favorable safety and effectiveness profiles for long-term use in Japanese men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. In addition, safety profiles in patients aged ≥75 years were similar to patients aged <75 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.