Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32440223›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2020

Feasibility Study of Advanced Cardiovascular Screening in Middle-Aged Patients with Diabetes.

Jes Sanddal Lindholt, Jan Frystyk, Jesper Hallas, Lars Melholt Rasmussen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Involving people with type 2 diabetes in facilitating participation in a cardiovascular screening programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jes Sanddal LindholtElitary Research Centre of Individualised Medicine in Arterial Disease (CIMA), Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9536-4488
Jan FrystykDepartment of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper HallasInstitute of Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8097-8708
Lars Melholt RasmussenElitary Research Centre of Individualised Medicine in Arterial Disease (CIMA), Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, University Hospital Odense, Odense, Denmark.
Axel Cosmus Pyndt DiederichsenElitary Research Centre of Individualised Medicine in Arterial Disease (CIMA), Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Odense, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1285-4826
Odense University Hospital · DKChartered Institute of Management Accountants · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCardiovascular mortality remains high among patients with diabetes compared with the general population. The primary aim was to evaluate the interest in and demand for advanced cardiovascular screening in patients with diabetes; the secondary aim was to explore its efficiency in detecting unprotected subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). PATIENTS AND

methodsIn a cross-sectional design, randomly selected 40-60-year-old men and women with diabetes were invited to the screening trial. Screening encompassed (1) a comprehensive medical interview; (2) non-contrast computed tomography scanning to quantify coronary artery and aortic valve calcification, to measure left atrial size, to assess heart rhythm and to detect aortic and iliac dilatations; (3) ankle and brachial blood pressure measurements; and (4) blood and urine samples for measurements of HbA

resultsOf 465 invited patients, 191 (41.1%) attended screening. The participation rate was 40% (95% CI:33-47) for males and 42% (95% CI:36-48) for females. Twenty-four patients were excluded due to previous CVD. The remaining patients' mean age was 52 years; 58% were males. Subclinical CVD was found in 64%, with a male preponderance (males 75% (95% CI:66-83; females 49% (95% CI:37-60)). Presence of severe coronary artery calcification (score ≥ 400) showed a male preponderance (males 19% (95% CI:12-27); females 7% (95% CI:3-16)). Aortic valve calcification, enlarged left atrial volume, atrial fibrillation, aortic dilatations, peripheral artery disease or increased pro-BNP were uncommon, and without any sex differences. Unprotected subclinical CVD was very common, and medical treatment was intensified in 60% (95% CI:53-68) of patients.

conclusionWe propose a feasible cardiovascular screening examination from which middle-aged patients with diabetes may benefit. However, the participation rate may be too low to warrant screening.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasecoronary artery calcificationCT scanningdiabetesrisk factorsscreening

Identifiers

PMID32440223
PMCPMC7221412
OpenAlexW3023129844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.