Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32439974›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

Diagnosing hereditary cancer predisposition in men with prostate cancer.

Mary Pritzlaff, Yuan Tian, Patrick Reineke, A J Stuenkel, Kyle Allen, Stephanie Gutierrez, Michelle Jackson, Jill S Dolinsky, Holly LaDuca, Jianfeng Xu and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. 2023 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Genetic testing in prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary PritzlaffAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA. mpritzlaff@ambrygen.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1886-4419
Yuan TianAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Patrick ReinekeAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
A J StuenkelAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Kyle AllenAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Stephanie GutierrezAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Michelle JacksonAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Jill S DolinskyAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Holly LaDucaAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Jianfeng XuDivision of Urology, Northshore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA.
Mary Helen BlackAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Brian T HelfandDivision of Urology, Northshore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA.
Ambry Genetics (United States) · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe describe the pathogenic variant spectrum and identify predictors of positive results among men referred for clinical genetic testing for prostate cancer.

methodsOne thousand eight hundred twelve men with prostate cancer underwent clinical multigene panel testing between April 2012 and September 2017. Stepwise logistic regression determined the most reliable predictors of positive results among clinical variables reported on test requisition forms.

resultsA yield of 9.4-12.1% was observed among men with no prior genetic testing. In this group, the positive rate of BRCA1 and BRCA2 was 4.6%; the positive rate for the mismatch repair genes was 2.8%. Increasing Gleason score (odds ratio [OR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.45); personal history of breast or pancreatic cancer (OR 3.62; 95% CI 1.37-9.46); family history of breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer (OR 2.32 95% CI 1.48-3.65); and family history of Lynch syndrome-associated cancers (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.23-3.15) were predictors of positive results.

conclusionThese results support multigene panel testing as the primary genetic testing approach for hereditary prostate cancer and are supportive of recommendations for consideration of germline testing in men with prostate cancer. Expanding the criteria for genetic testing should be considered as many pathogenic variants are actionable for treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisProstatic NeoplasmsGenes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansMalegenetic testingHRDMMRDmultigene panel testingprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32439974
PMCPMC7462744
OpenAlexW3027839729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.