Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32439706›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Reply to Sánchez-Pacheco et al., Chookajorn, and Mavian et al.: Explaining phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes.

Peter Forster, Lucy Forster, Colin Renfrew, Michael Forster

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Finding maximum common contractions between phylogenetic networks.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter ForsterInstitute of Forensic Genetics, 48161 Münster, Germany; pf223@cam.ac.uk.
Lucy ForsterLakeside Healthcare Group at Cedar House Surgery, St Neots PE19 1BQ, United Kingdom.
Colin RenfrewMcDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3ER, United Kingdom.
Michael ForsterFluxus Technology Limited, Colchester CO3 0NU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9927-5124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusGenomeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPhylogenyPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32439706
PMCPMC7293629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.