Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32439642›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Resting-State Brain Activity for Early Prediction Outcome in Postanoxic Patients in a Coma with Indeterminate Clinical Prognosis.

D Pugin, J Hofmeister, Y Gasche, S Vulliemoz, K-O Lövblad, D Van De Ville, S Haller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Neuroimaging in Disorders of Consciousness and Recovery.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

D PuginFrom the Departments of Intensive Care (D.P., Y.G.) Deborah.pugin@hcuge.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-9314
J HofmeisterRadiology (J.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-0071-8499
Y GascheFrom the Departments of Intensive Care (D.P., Y.G.).ORCID 0000-0002-0801-5907
S VulliemozNeurology (S.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-1877-8625
K-O LövbladNeuroradiology (K.-O.L.), Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2768-9779
D Van De VilleGeneva Neuroscience Center (J.H., D.V.D.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-2879-3861
S HallerFaculty of Medicine (S.H.), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7433-0203
Intensive Care Foundation · AUInstitute of Informatics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKNeurology, Inc · USResearch Institute of Radiology · BYUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeEarly outcome prediction of postanoxic patients in a coma after cardiac arrest proves challenging. Current prognostication relies on multimodal testing, using clinical examination, electrophysiologic testing, biomarkers, and structural MR imaging. While this multimodal prognostication is accurate for predicting poor outcome (ie, death), it is not sensitive enough to identify good outcome (ie, consciousness recovery), thus leaving many patients with indeterminate prognosis. We specifically assessed whether resting-state fMRI provides prognostic information, notably in postanoxic patients in a coma with indeterminate prognosis early after cardiac arrest, specifically for good outcome. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used resting-state fMRI in a prospective study to compare whole-brain functional connectivity between patients with good and poor outcomes, implementing support vector machine learning. Then, we automatically predicted coma outcome using resting-state fMRI and also compared the prediction based on resting-state fMRI with the outcome prediction based on DWI.

resultsOf 17 eligible patients who completed the study procedure (among 351 patients screened), 9 regained consciousness and 8 remained comatose. We found higher functional connectivity in patients recovering consciousness, with greater changes occurring within and between the occipitoparietal and temporofrontal regions. Coma outcome prognostication based on resting-state fMRI machine learning was very accurate, notably for identifying patients with good outcome (accuracy, 94.4%; area under the receiver operating curve, 0.94). Outcome predictors using resting-state fMRI performed significantly better (

conclusionsIndeterminate prognosis might lead to major clinical uncertainty and significant variations in life-sustaining treatments. Resting-state fMRI might bridge the gap left in early prognostication of postanoxic patients in a coma by identifying those with both good and poor outcomes.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAdultAgedBrainComaFemaleHeart ArrestHumansHypoxiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID32439642
PMCPMC7342736
OpenAlexW3027222108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.