Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32439090›Full record

ReviewGastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America2020

How Artificial Intelligence Will Impact Colonoscopy and Colorectal Screening.

Dennis L Shung, Michael F Byrne

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis L ShungSection of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208019, New Haven, CT 06520-8019, USA.
Michael F ByrneDivision of Gastroenterology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 5153 - 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: michael.byrne@vch.ca.
University of British Columbia · CAYale University · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN INVESTIGATIVE GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007017 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Fred Sanford Gorelick, Liza Konnikova · 1986 to 2026
$7.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence may improve value in colonoscopy-based colorectal screening and surveillance by improving quality and decreasing unnecessary costs. The quality of screening and surveillance as measured by adenoma detection rates can be improved through real-time computer-assisted detection of polyps. Unnecessary costs can be decreased with optical biopsies to identify low-risk polyps using computer-assisted diagnosis that can undergo the resect-and-discard or diagnose-and-leave strategy. Key challenges include the clinical integration of artificial intelligence-based technology into the endoscopists' workflow, the effect of this technology on endoscopy center efficiency, and the interpretability of the underlying deep learning algorithms. The future for image-based artificial intelligence in gastroenterology will include applications to improve the diagnosis and treatment of cancers throughout the gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerAdenomaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansIntestinal PolypsArtificial intelligenceColonoscopyValue-based care

Identifiers

PMID32439090
PMCPMC12007662
OpenAlexW3015434312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.