Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32439003›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2020

Physiological Stratification of Patients With Angina Due to Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

Haseeb Rahman, Ozan M Demir, Faisal Khan, Matthew Ryan, Howard Ellis, Mark T Mills, Amedeo Chiribiri, Andrew Webb, Divaka Perera

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Coronary flow and resistance patterns indexed by subtended myocardial mass in coronary microvascular dysfunction.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Definitions and standardized endpoints for the use of drug-coated balloon in coronary artery disease: consensus document of the Drug Coated Balloon Academic Research Consortium.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Haseeb RahmanBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ozan M DemirBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Faisal KhanBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew RyanBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Howard EllisBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark T MillsBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amedeo ChiribiriSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew WebbBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Divaka PereraBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: divaka.perera@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden and the ICR

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/16/49/32320Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is defined by diminished flow reserve. Functional and structural CMD endotypes have recently been described, with normal and elevated minimal microvascular resistance, respectively.

objectivesThis study determined the mechanism of altered resting and maximal flow in CMD endotypes.

methodsA total of 86 patients with angina but no obstructive coronary disease underwent coronary pressure and flow measurement during rest, exercise, and adenosine-mediated hyperemia and were classified as the reference group or as patients with CMD by a coronary flow reserve threshold of 2.5; functional or structural endotypes were distinguished by a hyperemic microvascular resistance threshold of 2.5 mm Hg/cm/s. Endothelial function was assessed by forearm blood flow (FBF) response to acetylcholine, and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity was defined as the inverse of FBF reserve to N

resultsOf the 86 patients, 46 had CMD (28 functional, 18 structural), and 40 patients formed the reference group. Resting coronary blood flow (CBF) (24.6 ± 2.0 cm/s vs. 16.6 ± 3.9 cm/s vs. 15.1 ± 4.7 cm/s; p < 0.001) and NOS activity (2.27 ± 0.96 vs. 1.77 ± 0.59 vs. 1.30 ± 0.16; p < 0.001) were higher in the functional group compared with the structural CMD and reference groups, respectively. The structural group had lower acetylcholine FBF augmentation than the functional or reference group (2.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.1 ± 1.7 vs. 4.5 ± 2.0; p < 0.001). On exercise, oxygen demand was highest (rate-pressure product: 22,157 ± 5,497 beats/min/mm Hg vs. 19,519 ± 4,653 beats/min/mm Hg vs. 17,530 ± 4,678 beats/min/mm Hg; p = 0.004), but peak CBF was lowest in patients with structural CMD compared with the functional and reference groups.

conclusionsFunctional CMD is characterized by elevated resting flow that is linked to enhanced NOS activity. Patients with structural CMD have endothelial dysfunction, which leads to diminished peak CBF augmentation and increased demand during exercise. The value of pathophysiologically stratified therapy warrants investigation.

Indexed as

MicrocirculationAdenosineAgedAngina PectorisBiomarkersBlood Flow VelocityCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationCoronary VesselsEndothelium, VascularExerciseFemaleHumansHyperemiaMaleAdenosineBiomarkersNitric Oxide Synthasecoronary flow reserveendothelial dysfunctionmicrovascular dysfunctionnitric oxidestratified medicine

Identifiers

PMID32439003
PMCPMC7242900
OpenAlexW3024205647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.