Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32438939›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2020

Caregiver involvement in psychiatric inpatient treatment - a representative survey among triads of patients, caregivers and hospital psychiatrists.

F Schuster, F Holzhüter, S Heres, J Hamann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. 'Triadic' shared decision making in mental health: Experiences and expectations of service users, caregivers and clinicians in Germany.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F SchusterKlinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-5359
F HolzhüterKlinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Munich, Germany.
S Hereskbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost, Klinik Nord, Munich, Germany.
J HamannKlinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3861-6017
TUM Klinikum · DEIsar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsStudies on the frequency of caregiver involvement in representative inpatient samples are scarce. The aim of our study was to conduct a representative survey on caregiver involvement in routine inpatient care involving all three parties (patients, caregivers, psychiatrists). Therefore, we performed face-to-face interviews consisting of open-ended questions to gain a deeper understanding of when and how caregivers are involved in care treatment and to identify which topics are mainly discussed.

methodsThis cross-sectional survey included inpatients from 55 acute psychiatric wards across ten psychiatric hospitals, their treating psychiatrists and, when possible, their caregivers. In total, we performed semi-structured face-to-face interviews with 247 patients, their treating psychiatrists and 94 informal caregivers. Each psychiatrist named the next two to three patients to be discharged. After a patient had given informed consent, the interview was performed by a researcher. In addition, the psychiatrist and, when possible, the primary caregiver identified by the patient, were also interviewed.

resultsIt was perceived by both patients and psychiatrists that contact between caregiver and psychiatrist had taken place in one-third of the patient cases. Predictors for psychiatrist-caregiver-contact were revealed in the patient's diagnosis (schizophrenia), a lower history of inpatient stays, and the respective hospital. According to psychiatrists the most frequent subjects of discussion with caregivers involved therapeutic issues and organisational and social-psychiatric topics (e.g. work, living and social support). Patients and caregivers stated that psychiatric treatment and the diagnostic classification of the mental illness were the most frequent topics of conversation. For all three groups, the most often cited reason for missed caregiver involvement was the subjective perception that a caregiver was not in fact needed.

conclusionsWhether or not caregivers were contacted and involved during an inpatient stay strongly depended on the individual hospital. The frequency of involvement of caregivers can certainly be increased by changing processes and structures in hospitals. All three parties (patients, caregivers and psychiatrists) most often stated that the caregiver was not involved in the treatment because they thought it was unnecessary. Evidence demonstrates the positive effect of caregivers' involvement on the therapeutic process but also on the well-being of the caregiver, therefore it is necessary to increase awareness of this evidence among all three interest groups.

Indexed as

Decision MakingProfessional-Family RelationsPsychiatryAdultCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, PsychiatricHumansInpatientsMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesFamiliesinpatient psychiatryquality of caresocial support

Identifiers

PMID32438939
PMCPMC7264704
OpenAlexW3028163690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.