Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32438858›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurotrauma2020

Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Andrew S Jack, Caitlin Hurd, John Martin, Karim Fouad

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurotrauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew S JackDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Caitlin HurdDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
John MartinDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Biomedical Sciences, City University of New York School of Medicine, and City University of New York Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA.
Karim FouadDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Lesion and Activity Dependent Corticospinal Tract PlasticityR01NS064004 · NINDS · RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK D/B/A RF CUNY - CUNY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI John H Martin · 2009 to 2026
$5.2M
CIHR 0011338NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike their peripheral nervous system counterparts, the capacity of central nervous system neurons and axons for regeneration after injury is minimal. Although a myriad of therapies (and different combinations thereof) to help promote repair and recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) have been trialed, few have progressed from bench-top to bedside. One of the few such therapies that has been successfully translated from basic science to clinical applications is electrical stimulation (ES). Although the use and study of ES in peripheral nerve growth dates back nearly a century, only recently has it started to be used in a clinical setting. Since those initial experiments and seminal publications, the application of ES to restore function and promote healing have greatly expanded. In this review, we discuss the progression and use of ES over time as it pertains to promoting axonal outgrowth and functional recovery post-SCI. In doing so, we consider four major uses for the study of ES based on the proposed or documented underlying mechanism: (1) using ES to introduce an electric field at the site of injury to promote axonal outgrowth and plasticity; (2) using spinal cord ES to activate or to increase the excitability of neuronal networks below the injury; (3) using motor cortex ES to promote corticospinal tract axonal outgrowth and plasticity; and (4) leveraging the timing of paired stimuli to produce plasticity. Finally, the use of ES in its current state in the context of human SCI studies is discussed, in addition to ongoing research and current knowledge gaps, to highlight the direction of future studies for this therapeutic modality.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansNerve RegenerationNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal TractsRecovery of FunctionSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord Stimulationaxonal outgrowthaxonal regenerationneuromodulationneuroplasticity plasticitySCItreatment

Identifiers

PMID32438858
PMCPMC7470222
OpenAlexW3026731264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.