Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32438709›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2020

Label-Free, High-Throughput Assay of Human Dendritic Cells from Whole-Blood Samples with Microfluidic Inertial Separation Suitable for Resource-Limited Manufacturing.

Mohamed Yousuff Caffiyar, Kue Peng Lim, Ismail Hussain Kamal Basha, Nor Hisham Hamid, Sok Ching Cheong, Eric Tatt Wei Ho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed Yousuff CaffiyarDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Perak 32610, Malaysia.
Kue Peng LimHead and Neck Cancer Research Group, Cancer Research Malaysia, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.
Ismail Hussain Kamal BashaDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Perak 32610, Malaysia.
Nor Hisham HamidDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Perak 32610, Malaysia.
Sok Ching CheongHead and Neck Cancer Research Group, Cancer Research Malaysia, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.
Eric Tatt Wei HoDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Perak 32610, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7590-1028
Universiti Teknologi Petronas · MYCancer Research Malaysia · MYUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

Ministry of Education Malaysia FRGS/1/2018/STG05/UTP/02/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidics technology has not impacted the delivery and accessibility of point-of-care health services, like diagnosing infectious disease, monitoring health or delivering interventions. Most microfluidics prototypes in academic research are not easy to scale-up with industrial-scale fabrication techniques and cannot be operated without complex manipulations of supporting equipment and additives, such as labels or reagents. We propose a label- and reagent-free inertial spiral microfluidic device to separate red blood, white blood and dendritic cells from blood fluid, for applications in health monitoring and immunotherapy. We demonstrate that using larger channel widths, in the range of 200 to 600 µm, allows separation of cells into multiple focused streams, according to different size ranges, and we utilize a novel technique to collect the closely separated focused cell streams, without constricting the channel. Our contribution is a method to adapt spiral inertial microfluidic designs to separate more than two cell types in the same device, which is robust against clogging, simple to operate and suitable for fabrication and deployment in resource-limited populations. When tested on actual human blood cells, 77% of dendritic cells were separated and 80% of cells remained viable after our assay.

Indexed as

dendritic cell separationinertial spiral microfluidicsresource-limited microfluidics

Identifiers

PMID32438709
PMCPMC7281724
OpenAlexW3009077948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.