Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32438607›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Best Evidence to Best Practice: Implementing an Innovative Model of Nutrition Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Improves Outcomes.

Merran Findlay, Nicole M Rankin, Tim Shaw, Kathryn White, Michael Boyer, Christopher Milross, Richard De Abreu Lourenço, Chris Brown, Gemma Collett, Philip Beale and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The roles of the dietitian in an 18-week telephone and mobile application nutrition intervention for upper gastrointestinal cancer: a qualitative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Merran FindlayCancer Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6964-1533
Nicole M RankinSydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Tim ShawSydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Kathryn WhiteSydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-1734
Michael BoyerChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Christopher MilrossChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Richard De Abreu LourençoCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Haymarket, NSW 2000, Australia.
Chris BrownNational Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2506-4871
Gemma CollettCancer Nursing Research Unit, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Philip BealeCancer Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Judith D BauerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-5147

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1092508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), impacting outcomes. Despite publication of nutrition care evidence-based guidelines (EBGs), evidence-practice gaps exist. This study aimed to implement and evaluate the integration of a patient-centred, best-practice dietetic model of care into an HNC multidisciplinary team (MDT) to minimise the detrimental sequelae of malnutrition. A mixed-methods, pre-post study design was used to deliver key interventions underpinned by evidence-based implementation strategies to address identified barriers and facilitators to change at individual, team and system levels. A data audit of medical records established baseline adherence to EBGs and clinical parameters prior to implementation in a prospective cohort. Key interventions included a weekly Supportive Care-Led Pre-Treatment Clinic and a Nutrition Care Dashboard highlighting nutrition outcome data integrated into MDT meetings. Focus groups provided team-level evaluation of the new model of care. Economic analysis determined system-level impact. The baseline clinical audit (n = 98) revealed barriers including reactive nutrition care, lack of familiarity with EBGs or awareness of intensive nutrition care needs as well as infrastructure and dietetic resource limitations. Post-implementation data (n = 34) demonstrated improved process and clinical outcomes: pre-treatment dietitian assessment; use of a validated nutrition assessment tool before, during and after treatment. Patients receiving the new model of care were significantly more likely to complete prescribed radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Differences in mean percentage weight change were clinically relevant. At the system level, the new model of care avoided 3.92 unplanned admissions and related costs of $AUD121K per annum. Focus groups confirmed clear support at the multidisciplinary team level for continuing the new model of care. Implementing an evidence-based nutrition model of care in patients with HNC is feasible and can improve outcomes. Benefits of this model of care may be transferrable to other patient groups within cancer settings.

Indexed as

AgedClinical AuditCost-Benefit AnalysisDieteticsEvidence-Based PracticeFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsGuideline AdherenceHead and Neck NeoplasmsHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedNutrition Assessmentevidence-based practicehead and neck neoplasmsimplementationmalnutritionresearch translation

Identifiers

PMID32438607
PMCPMC7284331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.