Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32438567›Full record

ReviewBiology2020

Danuta Kuzajewska, Agata Wszołek, Wojciech Żwierełło, Lucyna Kirczuk, Agnieszka Maruszewska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Innovative Nanocarriers: Magnetosomes in the Fight against Cancer.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Bacteria-Based Living Probes: Preparation and the Applications in Bioimaging and Diagnosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danuta KuzajewskaInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c St, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland.
Agata WszołekInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c St, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland.
Wojciech ŻwierełłoDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstańców Wlkp. 71 St, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Lucyna KirczukInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c St, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3710-8982
Agnieszka MaruszewskaInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c St, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important direction of research in increasing the effectiveness of cancer therapies is the design of effective drug distribution systems in the body. The development of the new strategies is primarily aimed at improving the stability of the drug after administration and increasing the precision of drug delivery to the destination. Due to the characteristic features of cancer cells, distributing chemotherapeutics exactly to the microenvironment of the tumor while sparing the healthy tissues is an important issue here. One of the promising solutions that would meet the above requirements is the use of

Indexed as

cancerdrug delivery systemsmagnetosomesMagnetotactic bacteriatargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID32438567
PMCPMC7284773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.