Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32438466›Full record

ArticleCancer2020

Why individual-level interventions are not enough: Systems-level determinants of oral anticancer medication adherence.

Lorraine T Dean, Marshalee George, Kimberley T Lee, Kimlin Ashing

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorraine T DeanDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2272-2755
Marshalee GeorgeDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kimberley T LeeDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kimlin AshingCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Health Equities, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USCity of Hope · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
The Brown Initiative in HIV and AIDS Clinical Research for Minority CommunitiesR25MH083620 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI NUNN, AMY STEWART · 2008 to 2025
$3.7M
NHLBI Training Program in PharmacoepidemiologyT32HL139426 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI G. Caleb Alexander, JODI B. SEGAL · 2018 to 2026
$2.5M
Social Determinants of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipK01CA184288 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DEAN, LORRAINE TIERA · 2014 to 2018
$767k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA184288NCI NIH HHS K01CA184288NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P30CA006973NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL139426NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL139426NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH083620NIMH NIH HHS R25MH083620Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center P30CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonadherence to oral anticancer medications (OAMs) in the United States is as low as 33% for some cancers. The reasons for nonadherence to these lifesaving medications are multifactorial, yet the majority of studies focus on patient-level factors influencing uptake and adherence. Individually based interventions to increase patient adherence have not been effective, and this warrants attention to factors at the payor, pharmaceutical, and clinical systems levels. Based on the authors' research and clinical experiences, this commentary brings fresh attention to the long-standing issue of OAM nonadherence, a growing quality-of-care issue, from a systems perspective. In this commentary, the key driving factors in pharmaceutical and payor systems (state and federal laws, payor/insurance companies, and pharmaceutical companies), clinical systems (hospitals and providers), and patient contexts that have trickle-down effects on patient adherence to OAMs are outlined. In the end, the authors' recommendations include examining the influence of laws governing OAM drug pricing, OAM supply, and provider reimbursement; reducing the need for prior authorization of long-approved OAMs; identifying cost-effective ways for providers to monitor nonadherence; examining issues of provider bias in OAM prescriptions; and further elucidating in which contexts patients are likely to be able to adhere. These recommendations offer a starting point for an examination of the chain of systems influencing patient adherence and may help to finally resolve persistently high levels of OAM nonadherence.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdministration, OralAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agentsendocrine therapyhealth insuranceoral anticancer medicationssocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID32438466
PMCPMC7467097
OpenAlexW3026662401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.