Trial reportBlood2020
Thrombosis in patients with myeloma treated in the Myeloma IX and Myeloma XI phase 3 randomized controlled trials.
Trial report in Blood, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elevated D-dimer levels in high-risk multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Anticoagulation for the prevention of arterial thromboembolism in cancer patients by primary tumour site: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Pooled it
- Mitigating the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory-based therapy.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Daratumumab plus lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Analysis of vascular thrombotic events in the GRIFFIN study.British journal of haematology · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Verification and optimization of the VTE risk stratification system for multiple myeloma.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients based on thrombosis prophylaxis.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Clinical factors associated with venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab.Discover medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing the use of melflufen (melphalan flufenamide) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations for clinical practice.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Thromboembolism and bleeding in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: rates, risk profile, and patterns of thromboprophylaxis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis and Validation of the IMPEDED VTE, IMPEDE VTE, and SAVED Risk Models in Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Retrospective Study in Türkiye.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A systematic review of direct oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Review
- Evaluation of risk factors for thromboembolic events in multiple myeloma patients using multiple machine learning models.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Its Associated Risk Factors in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma: a case-based review with practical guidelines.Annals of hematology · 2024Review
- Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but data are lacking from large prospective cohorts. We present thrombosis outcome data from Myeloma IX (n = 1936) and Myeloma XI (n = 4358) phase 3 randomized controlled trials for NDMM that treated transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients before and after publication of thrombosis prevention guidelines. In Myeloma IX, transplant-eligible patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (CVAD) induction had higher risk of VTE compared with patients treated with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) (22.5% [n = 121 of 538] vs 16.1% [n = 89 of 554]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR],1.46; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.11-1.93). For transplant-ineligible patients, those randomly assigned to attenuated CTD (CTDa) induction had a higher risk of VTE compared with those treated with melphalan and prednisolone (MP) (16.0% [n = 68 of 425] vs 4.1% [n = 17 of 419]; aHR, 4.25; 95% CI, 2.50-7.20). In Myeloma XI, there was no difference in risk of VTE (12.2% [n = 124 of 1014] vs 13.2% [n = 133 of 1008]; aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72-1.18) or arterial thrombosis (1.2% [n = 12 of 1014] vs 1.5% [n = 15 of 1008]; aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.70) between transplant-eligible pathways for patients treated with cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRD) or CTD. For transplant-ineligible patients, there was no difference in VTEs between attenuated CRD (CRDa) and CTDa (10.4% [n = 95 of 916] vs 10.7% [n = 97 of 910]; aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.29). However, arterial risk was higher with CRDa than with CTDa (3.1% [n = 28 of 916] vs 1.6% [n = 15 of 910]; aHR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.02-3.57). Thrombotic events occurred almost entirely within 6 months of treatment initiation. Thrombosis was not associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS), apart from inferior OS for patients with arterial events (aHR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.12-2.08) in Myeloma XI. The Myeloma XI trial protocol incorporated International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) thrombosis prevention recommendations and compared with Myeloma IX, more patients received thromboprophylaxis (80.5% vs 22.3%) with lower rates of VTE for identical regimens (CTD, 13.2% vs 16.1%; CTDa, 10.7% vs 16.0%). However, thrombosis remained frequent in spite of IMWG-guided thromboprophylaxis, suggesting that new approaches are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.