Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32437922›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2020

Treatment Outcomes After Proton Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma of the Pelvis.

Haruka Uezono, Daniel J Indelicato, Ronny L Rotondo, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Scott M Bradfield, Christopher G Morris, Julie A Bradley

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances in Radiation Therapy for Primary Bone Malignancies.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haruka UezonoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Daniel J IndelicatoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Ronny L RotondoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Raymond B Mailhot VegaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Scott M BradfieldDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Nemours Children's Specialty Care, Jacksonville, Florida.
Christopher G MorrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Julie A BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida. Electronic address: jbradley@floridaproton.org.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEwing sarcoma of the pelvis is associated with inferior local control compared with those arising from other primary sites. Despite its increased use, outcome data for treatment with proton therapy remain limited. We report 3-year disease control and toxicity in pediatric patients treated with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients aged ≤21 years (median, 14 years) with nonmetastatic pelvic Ewing sarcoma received proton therapy and chemotherapy between 2010 and 2018. Overall survival and tumor control rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A log-rank test assessed significance between strata of prognostic factors. Significant toxicity was reported per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

resultsMost patients received definitive radiation (n = 26; median dose 55.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]; range, 54.0-64.8), 7 received preoperative radiation (50.4 Gy RBE), and 2 received postoperative radiation (45 Gy RBE and 54 Gy RBE). The median primary tumor size was 10.5 cm. With a median follow-up of 3 years (range, 0.3-9.0 years), the 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65%-93%), 64% (95% CI, 45%-79%), and 92% (95% CI, 74%-98%), respectively. There was no association between local control, progression-free survival, or overall survival and tumor size, patient age, radiation dose, or definitive versus pre-/postoperative radiation therapy. Median time to progression was 1 year (range, 0.1-1.9 years). All patients with large tumors (≥8 cm) who underwent definitive proton therapy with a higher dose (≥59.4 Gy RBE) remained free from tumor recurrence (n = 5). Five patients experienced grade ≥2 subacute/late toxicity, all of whom were treated with combined surgery and radiation.

conclusionsDefinitive proton therapy offers local control comparable to photon therapy in pediatric patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma. These data lend preliminary support to radiation dose escalation without significant toxicity, which may contribute to the favorable outcomes. Combined surgery and radiation therapy, particularly preoperative radiation, is associated with postoperative complications, but not survival, compared with radiation alone.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePelvic NeoplasmsSarcoma, EwingTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32437922
OpenAlexW3021945301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.