ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
Integrating multi-OMICS data through sparse canonical correlation analysis for the prediction of complex traits: a comparison study.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sparse CCA-based mediation analysis with high-dimensional exposures and mediators.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for TCR Repertoire Epitope Annotation and Pattern Discovery.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Sparse Gaussianized Canonical Correlation Analysis with Applications to Portfolio Analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026Article
- Mutual learning for joint disease detection and severity prediction reveals multimodal pathogenesis for neurodegenerative disorders.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Functional dynamics between resident transcriptionally active microbes (TAMs) and host genes underlie Dengue severity.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Trustworthy causal biomarker discovery: a multiomics brain imaging genetics-based approach.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Multimodal data integration in early-stage breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Review
- Multi-omics integration identifies molecular markers and biological pathways for carcass and meat quality traits in Nellore cattle.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mutual-assistance learning for trustworthy biomarker discovery and disease prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Identifying genes associated with disease outcomes using joint sparse canonical correlation analysis-An application in renal clear cell carcinoma.Genetic epidemiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Smccnet 2.0: a comprehensive tool for multi-omics network inference with shiny visualization.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Advancing drug-response prediction using multi-modal and -omics machine learning integration (MOMLIN): a case study on breast cancer clinical data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Elucidating Cancer Subtypes by Using the Relationship between DNA Methylation and Gene Expression.Genes · 2024Article
- High microbiome and metabolome diversification in coexisting sponges with different bio-ecological traits.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Modeling genotype-protein interaction and correlation for Alzheimer's disease: a multi-omics imaging genetics study.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- TOSCCA: a framework for interpretation and testing of sparse canonical correlations.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- SINGLE-CELL TRANSCRIPTOME ANALYSIS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2024Article
- Multi-view data visualisationPeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationRecent developments in technology have enabled researchers to collect multiple OMICS datasets for the same individuals. The conventional approach for understanding the relationships between the collected datasets and the complex trait of interest would be through the analysis of each OMIC dataset separately from the rest, or to test for associations between the OMICS datasets. In this work we show that integrating multiple OMICS datasets together, instead of analysing them separately, improves our understanding of their in-between relationships as well as the predictive accuracy for the tested trait. Several approaches have been proposed for the integration of heterogeneous and high-dimensional (p≫n) data, such as OMICS. The sparse variant of canonical correlation analysis (CCA) approach is a promising one that seeks to penalize the canonical variables for producing sparse latent variables while achieving maximal correlation between the datasets. Over the last years, a number of approaches for implementing sparse CCA (sCCA) have been proposed, where they differ on their objective functions, iterative algorithm for obtaining the sparse latent variables and make different assumptions about the original datasets.
resultsThrough a comparative study we have explored the performance of the conventional CCA proposed by Parkhomenko et al., penalized matrix decomposition CCA proposed by Witten and Tibshirani and its extension proposed by Suo et al. The aforementioned methods were modified to allow for different penalty functions. Although sCCA is an unsupervised learning approach for understanding of the in-between relationships, we have twisted the problem as a supervised learning one and investigated how the computed latent variables can be used for predicting complex traits. The approaches were extended to allow for multiple (more than two) datasets where the trait was included as one of the input datasets. Both ways have shown improvement over conventional predictive models that include one or multiple datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/theorod93/sCCA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.