Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32437406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The effect of housing environment on bone healing in a critical radius defect in New Zealand White rabbits.

Patricia Hedenqvist, Amela Trbakovic, Torbjörn Mellgren, Caroline Öhman-Mägi, Petra Hammarström Johansson, Elin Manell, Stina Ekman, Cecilia Ley, Marianne Jensen-Waern, Andreas Thor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia HedenqvistDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4540-6250
Amela TrbakovicDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Plastic & Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Torbjörn MellgrenDepartment of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Caroline Öhman-MägiDepartment of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Petra Hammarström JohanssonDepartment of Prosthodontics / Dental Materials Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Odontology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elin ManellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4491-7609
Stina EkmanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cecilia LeyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marianne Jensen-WaernDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Andreas ThorDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Plastic & Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9590-2039
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUppsala University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In animal studies on bone healing, the effect of housing space and physical activity are seldom taken into account. Bone formation was evaluated in New Zealand White rabbits (mean ± SEM BW: 3.9 ± 0.11 kg) with a critical bone defect after 12 weeks of rehabilitation in pair-housing in 3 m2 large floor pens (Floor, n = 10) or standard single housing in 0.43 m2 cages (Cage, n = 10). In the randomised full-factorial study, a bone replica of calcium phosphate cement (CPC, n = 10) or autologous bone (AB, n = 10) was implanted in the unilateral 20 mm radius defect. Post-mortem, the oxidative capacity was measured by citrate synthase (CS) activity in M. quadriceps and the defect filling volume and density evaluated by microcomputer tomography (μ-CT). Histology sections were evaluated by subjective scoring and histomorphometry. Fourteen rabbits remained until the end of the study. Group Floor (n = 7; 3 CPC + 4 AB) had a higher CS activity and a larger bone defect filling volume and lower density by μ-CT measurements than group Cage (n = 7; 3 CPC + 4 AB). Three out of four rabbits in AB-Floor presented fusion of the defect with reorganisation of trabecular bone, whereas three of four in AB-Cage showed areas of incomplete healing. Floor rabbits had a higher score of bony fusion between the radius and ulna than Cage rabbits. There were no differences between groups in histomorphometry. The study found that a larger housing space increased physical activity and promoted bone formation.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisAnimalsBone CementsBone SubstitutesBone TransplantationCalcium PhosphatesFemaleHousing, AnimalRabbitsRadiusWound HealingBone CementsBone Substitutescalcium phosphateCalcium Phosphates

Identifiers

PMID32437406
PMCPMC7241799
OpenAlexW3026237064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.